What has confused you?
Are you in favor of passing laws in the legislature by the peoples' elected representatives or in favor of judges legislating from the bench?
Aren't you all in favor of judges now legislating from the bench? Isn't that this is all about, disagreeing with court rulings and trying to find somebody who agrees with you?
As for the sanctity of marriage - when there is no marriage - the sanctity of life is extant.
Well, you must not be talking about this case, because there is a marriage here. Legal and all.
1)What has confused you?
Answer - your inconsistency
2)Aren't you all in favor of judges now legislating from the bench?
Answer: No
3)Isn't that this is all about, disagreeing with court rulings and trying to find somebody who agrees with you?
Answer: No - the concern for Terri's constitutional rights is due process, which is not confined.
4)Well, you must not be talking about this case, because there is a marriage here. Legal and all.
Answer: So any husband can imprison any one of his two wives in a basement and withhold all the necessities of life and society be damned?
It appears to have been a sham marriage for a while now, given his affairs and current long-term cohabitation with a mistress with whom he has fathered 2 children. I think there are legitimate questions about whether he has had her best interests in mind over the last several years.
It is a royal mess. Hopefully this will spur many to think through how these issues could affect their own lives and those they love, and sit down and make plans for what could happen. If a living will is what someone wants, they need to draw it up ASAP, not put it off.