Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wanted: Unification of India and Pakistan
Asia News Network/The Statesman ^ | 2005-03-12

Posted on 03/12/2005 11:47:16 PM PST by nickcarraway

Despite on-field rivalry, the game of cricket is proving to be a great unifier. Almost a religion in both India and Pakistan, the fans of the game have had the opportunity to cross the border and mingle with each other in recent times. That has resulted in a certain bonhomie and fellow feeling among the people of the two nations, who have traditionally seen each other as enemies. In Mohali for the first of the three Tests between India and Pakistan, the visitors from across the border are not only talking about peace and amity, but are also expressing wishes about a possible unification of the two countries. And for most of them, India is looking like a haven in all spheres of life — political, social and economic.

A resident of Lahore, Mr Khaakzadah M Anwar Kamal came to India just out of curiosity. “The match is just an excuse to get the visa. I have dreamt of visiting India since 1996,” he said. And he has been astounded by the freedom of movement that women enjoy and he freedom of expression and worship that he has witnessed here. He claimed that in Pakistan Christians are the most unappreciated minority.

“Only after General Pervez Musharraf condemned violence against them that they are holding their heads high.” “I wish the border between the two countries disappears and we can all be one family. I want to go back and tell my people that India is not the land of kafirs but a land of grace and courtesy.”

Mohammed Asif said though he initially came only for the cricket matches, after reaching India he has realised that a lot can happen between the two countries. “The Berlin Wall can come down. South and North Korea can get together. Then why can’t Pakistan and India unite?” The slogan “Cricket to ek bahana hai, hamein dillon ko milana hai” (Cricket is only an excuse. We are here to unite hearts) has captured the minds of people of both the countries here.

For some Pakistanis, India’s economic condition is a great attraction. Mr Adul Karim and his wife Salma, wants to own a house in Chandigarh. ”You know, the domestic rate of electricity in Pakistan is Rs 7 per unit, whereas in India it is mush less. You have to shell out around Rs 4 lakh to own a Maruti car in Pakistan, but here you can get it for around Rs 2.2 lakh.” Even magazines and newspapers are much more expensive. Fond as they are of Bollywood, people of Pakistan have to shell out nearly Rs 100 for a film magazine that costs around Rs 30 in India.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cricket; india; pakistan; southasia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Gengis Khan

Read my post again. The fiefdom of the central govt is the problem, not any particular leader. The ruling class gets privileges bestowed upon them by the govt. I can guarantee you that a Bengali couldn't care less about a Marathi who probably has never seen an Assamese in his life that couldn't understand a word coming out of the mouth of a Punjabi. What keeps a country like that together? Cross-subsidization and central control. Make sure that an Assamese or a Dalit in Bihar or someone in rural Bengal cannot eat, cannot farm, cannot even squat without seeking the approval of the central govt.

This is nothing unique to India. In the US, the right wants more power and control close to home because a govt closest to home is the best governed because it is the most closely scrutinized. No wonder states in India with either natural resources to means to support itself wants to break away from India, whereas states that have nothing like the cross-subsidization.


41 posted on 03/13/2005 10:23:44 PM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I could care less how my countrymen think. The only norm in the US is you don't have to subscribe to it.

Yugoslavia is a pipe dream of Marshall Tito. The Muslim majority in various sections of the Balkans would have been a problem anyways - with or without Yugoslavia. At least now we know who to watch over. The only guarantee with a unified Yugoslavia is a perpetual state of civil war, which is present in many parts of India that wants to be free.


42 posted on 03/13/2005 10:31:54 PM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
Buddy one advise for you...........try not to educate Indians about India just because sometime in your life you made a short trip to India. Ever wondered why the Indians were so "unreceptive" to you? Its because it pi$$es of Indians (whever they may belong) to be told by an outsider as to what is good for them and how they should do things. You were lucky because Indians are polite to outsiders and so they were just "unreceptive". Had it been me.........
 
You are the only person in the world who thinks that the dismemberment of Yugoslavia is a bad thing.
 
Sorry, there are a billion other Indians behind him who thinks the same way.
 
Just because you live in India, that doesn't mean you speak for most Indians. Take a trip into the rural areas of Bihar and Bengal and see how many of your fellow Indians share your feelings. Just because you are an Indian, that doesn't mean I cannot speak for those who would rather be free from Indian fiefdom. India wants to run a modern economy with dark age policies. They have preserved the worst aspects of the British raj, and have invented a few of their own.
 
He does speak for most Indians I know (and I know more Indians than you do) on the issue of political unity. Me and sukhoi are from diverse background. He is a south Indian Christian and I am Hindu bengali brahmin. I have seen and lived in rural Bengal and Bihar much more than you did. And I know how many Indians share his (sukhoi's) feelings as far as the unity of India goes. As Indians we may have our political differences on who or what party we support but if you tell an average Bihari that breaking India apart would be a good idea, the next thing you might know is you got yourself broken up.

43 posted on 03/13/2005 10:36:12 PM PST by Gengis Khan ("There is no glory in incomplete action." -- Gengis Khan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

"South and North Korea can get together. Then why can’t Pakistan and India unite?"

That's really a poor example.


44 posted on 03/13/2005 10:36:15 PM PST by streetpreacher (The fires of hell burn hot and try to destroy me, I run to your will Oh God I know you’ll restore me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

Of course a billion Indians believe in a unified Yugoslavia. What else can I expect from a billion hungry mouths waiting in line to pick up their ration. If they felt otherwise, the central subsidies will evaporate instantly. Marshall Tito and Nehru were good friends. Tito must have taught his friend well how to keep different groups toe the govt line.

I just didn't take a short trip to India. I have lived there for close to six years. Two years in the seventies during the emergency, two years in the early eighties and two years in the late eighties, not to mention several trip in the nineties. Something always happens to someone in the Gandhi family when I show up. But, I have spent most of my life outside my country. I have lived in East Asia, Africa, and Europe. I have seen enough of the world to know what works and what doesn't and how govt controls its own citizens to perpetuate its own propaganda to keep a few in power.

It may mean very little to a Bengali babu, but I have made it my mission in life to spread freedom wherever I see oppression. That means you need to do more than raise tempest in your tea cup within the cosy confines of Coffee House. Come to think of it most good things in India in the modern era has taken place because of influence of outsiders. You need to go to your closest temple and perform a pooja to thank Warren Hastings, who did more social reform in India since Adi Sankaracharya. Also, just because I am an outsider that doesn't mean I don't know prejudice when I see it. I was in India the day Mrs Gandhi was assassinated. What followed in Delhi and many other parts of India for the next few days was nothing short of ethnic cleansing. I was able to hide two Sikh families in the American and British embassy. I can guarantee you they didn't care what my nationality was. Spending one week in Delhi in the middle of hell changed me forever. Too late my Bengali babu, every oppressed person in the world is my business. If it alters your little universe from Ballygunge to Shyambazar, then you better get used to living with me. I am coming for two months to work in Haldia outside Calcutta. Maybe I will stop by to proselytize.


45 posted on 03/13/2005 11:17:45 PM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: FreedomSurge; blam; SunkenCiv
They wiped out Buddahism in India though.

Actually Buddhism wasn't wiped out in India by violence at all -- the people slowly reverted back to Hinduism, or rather a form of Hinduism different to what was practised before Buddhism -- the earlier form was Vedic Hinduism and the latter form Brahminical Hinduism. It's not clearly known why exactly Buddhism peterd out (the Mauryas were rulers over the entire Indian continent and promoted Buddhism, but the Guptas who came much later were Hindu, so I guess the lack of royal patronage caused Buddhism to decay -- though it spread at that time to Central Asia and China and South East Asia.
46 posted on 03/13/2005 11:54:10 PM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad; ThermoNuclearWarrior
You just need to look outside the Arab world.

I disagree with you completely -- Thermo stated that the majority supported terrorism, you may have met the minority. Secondly, I've found that Arabs from Nord Africa are less fanatical as compared to Wahabbis in Saudi A and Pakistan -- and Pakistan is NOT part of the ME. You also find Mooslimb fanatics in Indonesia etc. -- outside the Arab world
47 posted on 03/14/2005 12:37:12 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Gengis Khan

i smell a paki here.

i am a so called minority in india and believe me i would rather see us get nuked than dismember like yugos.lol by the way stop the wet dream of balkanistaion of india.if and when we go down we will everyone with us.;)lol...inlcuding your beloved pukistan.


48 posted on 03/14/2005 12:40:11 AM PST by asoka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

There are Muslim fanatics everywhere, including the US. The point is how many of them actually support terrorism. While Arabs (including Christian Arabs) support Palestinian intifada, you will find little support of terrorism among non-Arab Muslims. But, as usual, exceptions are everywhere.


49 posted on 03/14/2005 12:40:27 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
But there are plenty of Christian Arabs who side with Palestinians as well.

But they don't side with the violence -- the violence is exclusively supported by the slamics.
50 posted on 03/14/2005 12:41:22 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
Different parts of India should separate into different countries based on culture and language.

Oh, and I suppose you want the United States to be broken up into different countries as well -- the littoral BLUE states, the RED states and Texas, eh?
51 posted on 03/14/2005 12:42:30 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Asoka was the last ruler who supported Buddhism in his later life. Sankaracharya was able to bring a lot of Buddhists back into Hinduism by his vast social reforms.


52 posted on 03/14/2005 12:42:41 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
India is a giant Yugoslavia. Different parts of India should separate into different countries based on culture and language.

And I guess you like the idea of Balkanisation -- splitting up people into different groups and having them fight against and kill each other.
53 posted on 03/14/2005 12:43:20 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
I will side with the oppressed any day of the week. If that makes me sadistic, I wear that honor with pride.

With the oppressed? What oppressed? You mean the Sikhs in India -- ooops, the Prime Minister of India is a Sikh. DO you mean the Muslimes? Hey, the President is one. DO you mean Christians? The Leader of the main party is CAtholic. Who are these phantom 'oppressed' you are talking about?
54 posted on 03/14/2005 12:44:45 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

To: Cronos

When did I support such a thing. It is hard to get into a discussion who puts words into your mouth.


56 posted on 03/14/2005 12:46:09 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad; sukhoi-30mki; Arjun; CarrotAndStick; AM2000
I cannot speak for all of India, but if what I have seen in Bihar is any indication

Ah, there's econ's problem -- he's seen India's shame, Bihar. That's a cesspit of a state with the lowest literacty, employment etc. levels and the one that drags India down -- along with UP, it is the state most Indians wish would sink to hell and good riddance. However, they still keep paying for the upkeep of those states. Look at the WEstern and Southern states -- their literacy, economic etc. levels are far, far better.
57 posted on 03/14/2005 12:47:22 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Read my posts. The problem with the Indian govt is the fiefdom that it runs. It will bestow favors on some Sikhs to turn against other Sikhs. The Indian govt has preserved the worst of the British Raj.


58 posted on 03/14/2005 12:48:59 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: econ_grad
Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, Montenegro - were all independent before the Soviets "unified" them.

Hogwash -- before WWII and the Soviets, there was the State of Yugoslavia -- the state of the Southern Slavs. This was formed out of Serbia, the provinces of Austria-Hungary and Turkey that were liberated after WWI -- before WWI, the Balkan states were members of either the Austro-Hungarian or Ottoman empires -- do read up on your history/
59 posted on 03/14/2005 12:50:03 AM PST by Cronos (Never forget 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

Rural Bihar was no different than rural Bengal or rural Assam. Unless you go into rural India, you don't get the grip of the central rule in India. India is still run like Tito ran Yugoslavia. You can either reform the Gandhian form of govt, which I thought BJP was going to bring in but they failed. Or, you let states secede. Trust me, different parts of India will be more productive and a lot less corrupt if that happens.


60 posted on 03/14/2005 12:53:46 AM PST by econ_grad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson