Problem solved.
Not really. The ISS is in a much lower orbit that would cause a bigger problem of light pollution from the Earth. The Space Shuttle missions to the Hubble are the highest altitude missions ever undertaken by the Space Shuttle. Another thing is that if it were connected to the ISS, a telescope would have problems with vibrations that would interfere with pointing it steadily.
Also Hubble has no hydrazine attitude jets that could contaminate the lens.
The only problem may arise with long exposures combined with a closer earth orbit.
As for vibrations, I would guess that we can do things to minimize it. Both electronically and mechanically.
I think this is better than scrapping it. It does provide some interesting pics, but it is my opinion that it has done all it is going to do as far as advancement of science.
A new scope is going to be launched soon that takes infrared images. We learn more from these and the loss of the Hubble is not going to slow us down.IMO The Hubble has lasted well beyond it's design.
I just did not want the spare parts to go to waste. I also understand that there is another prototype housing someplace. It would be good for charting space and asteroids.