Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
The Republicans are claiming that 51 votes should be enough to win confirmation of the White House's judicial nominees. This flies in the face of Senate history.

Exactly what is the Slimes referring to? Generally, the Slimes will take a kernel of a grain of half truth and distort it all out of actual meaning. What was their kernal of truth that they are alluding to? When do they think a majority not been enough for a judicial confirmation?

98 posted on 03/05/2005 8:58:03 PM PST by blanknoone (Steyn: "The Dems are all exit and no strategy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: blanknoone; Congressman Billybob; ambrose; PGalt; Lancey Howard; All
When do they think a majority not been enough for a judicial confirmation?

I hate to confirm what the Times alluded to, but the pubbies denied up or down votes to Paez for four years and Berzon for two years until Trent Lott relented on Mar 9, 2000 with those Clinton nominees. They are hoisting us on our own petard, although some were quoted at the time saying that they would never do what they are doing now, by refusing to vote for cloture.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/R?r106:FLD001:S51345

Go down the page until you see a linked "Page: S1340"

Page: S1340
Judge Deserves Rousing Approval
Infamous Anniversary for Courts
The Paez and Berzon Votes
Senate GOP Drags Feet on Justices
Ending a Judicial Blockade

102 posted on 03/05/2005 9:33:59 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson