That claim, coming from you, would make me laugh if it didn't turn my stomach so much.
Accuracy is important. Dimensio came nowhere near proving his smear against creationists.
You didn't ask him to "prove" his statement, you asked him to provide a "few" examples. He did so. Then suddenly you moved the goalposts all over the place -- now it's "proof" you want...
Tell me, just how many examples can you give from the past 30 days of yourself challenging a "smear" from a creationist? Just how much do you actually value "truth"?
Claiming he was right would be a lie.
No, admitting that he MET YOUR SPECIFIC CHALLENGE would be honorable. This is why you have not done it.
Furthermore, you know he's right -- you've seen that behavior on these threads just like the rest of us. Your current lawyering to avoid admitting that fact is just ludicrous, and is the real "lie".
I thought you didn't like lies.
Indeed I do not.
Now you want me to lie?
No -- I want you to be honorable. I wait in vain.
It continues to be as it has been since 1859. The less evidence one has, the more one has to fabricate it, mischaracterize his opponents, and the louder one has to yell.
So you *are* familiar with the behavior of the anti-evolutionists. Nice of you to acknowledge it.
Sure...