[Dataman]

Dataman seems to want me to find a posting where a creationist says exactly "All who accept evolution are atheists",

That was your claim, wasn't it? Hmmm. You posted 7 examples. Let's see how many actually support your claim:

"Evolutionists resist Creation, since it would presuppose God..."

So you really think that is the same as "all evolutionists are atheists" do you? Nope. This one fails

"And, speaking of materialists, that is the atheist connection, since a fundamental, though illogical, first principle of evolution is naturalism. Naturalism denies the existence of anything besides matter and its motion. Naturalism (also known as materialism) is necessarily atheistic and is the connecting point between evolution and unbelief. (Do note who made that statement)"

That materialists are atheists is true. Are all evolutionists materialists? Nope. This one also fails.

"I generally distrust the judgment of evolutionists because they're atheists."

This one appears to be a fabrication (would an evolutionist fabricate evidence? Say it ain't so!). The error is:

The requested document does not exist on this server. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Okay

So far that's two strikes and one fabrication. Four more to go.

"Too bad the premise of an evolutionist is that God doesn't exist and if He does He is too stupid to create humans and all we see."

It looks like you actually hit on one here. Too bad you had to go all the way back to July. That gives a total of one poster with two posts in the last 7 months. I don't think we've hit "often" yet.

"Evolution theory exists because people don't want to believe they were made by a superior being to whom they are also responsible for their lives."

Nope. This doesn't say all evolutionists are atheists. The statement only gives a reason for the theory.

"According to the evolutionist there will be no final exam."

This is a true statement. It is only false if "the" is replaced with "all." You can have that one, though, because the wording is too imprecise. That's two posters and 3 times in the last 7 months. Still not "often."

"The clincher here is this, if I'm correct in my belief in the book of Genesis, I'll be spending eternity in a field of clover with a cold drink right there whenever I reach for it. Meanwhile, you and your buddies will be stoking a furnace while Asmodeus, Judas Iscariot and Adolf Hitler take turns jabbing you in the glutei with a trident should you stop shoveling for a moment to wipe your brow."

Shame, Dimensio. The reply was to "you and your buddies,", not all evolutionists. And it was about your (plural)eternal destiny, a place not exclusive to atheists. This one fails too.

Just as the subject of this thread felt the need to fabricate evidence to make himself or his weltanshauung seem credible, you have manufactured the clam that creationists often claim all evolutionists are atheists. But even if it were true, why should it bother you? Is the label "atheist" to be avoided?

[Ichneumon]

Good lord, that was *pathetic*. He proved his point, and you can't even bring yourself to drop it, much less admit it, so you go on and on "lawyering" on trivialities. Is being honorable just that bloody hard for you?

Never mind, I know the answer -- and you're incapable of giving the straight answer.

[Dimensio]

I don't really have time to go over everything right now, because I know that Dataman is far too dishonest and hypocritical to do anything but weasel around here, so I'll just pick out a few things that I want to address right away.

"I generally distrust the judgment of evolutionists because they're atheists."

This one appears to be a fabrication (would an evolutionist fabricate evidence? Say it ain't so!). The error is:

The requested document does not exist on this server. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Okay

So far that's two strikes and one fabrication. Four more to go.

Yes, because it must be a fabrication because it's impossible that I just messed up the link.

I made a mistake. Not in the quote itself, but in linking to the quote. Unlike you, Dataman, when my evidence doesn't check out, it's typically because I made an error in presentation, not because I was lying outright.

But hey, if you want to call me a liar even though I just messed up the link, go ahead. I won't wait for your apology.

Shame, Dimensio. The reply was to "you and your buddies,", not all evolutionists. And it was about your (plural)eternal destiny, a place not exclusive to atheists. This one fails too

Gee, and now I wonder why I bothered linking back to the original posts. I guess that it was too much to expect you to read for context where, if you read back through, you will see that he also made the statement "My view of FR has changed after reading this thread. I never knew that conservative America was made up of so many people who are so desperate to deny God that they stoop to elaborate, unprovable, inimitable and riciculous theories."

But, of course, you'll say that he wasn't talking about all evolutionists, he was just talking about all of the evolutionsts that he happened to be addressing at the time.

But, hey, after nagging, prodding and badgering, you did finally admit that I met your "find one" challenge, even if the admission had to be dragged out of you. Maybe there's hope for you yet.

[Ichneumon]

But even if it were true, why should it bother you?

Why did it bother *you* enough to turn it into your Holy Crusade du jour?