Lurkers, please note. Evolutionists post links or excerpts to support their positions. Creationists post cryptic remarks and then refuse to support their contentions. Who are you going to believe? The folks who supply you with their sources or those who do not?
Too funny.
Junior, you need to read more of my posts to learn how to handle Walsh. You aren't doing so hot right now. And that's a fact.
Depends on a number of things, including:
Their sources;
How much time and effort you have to exert to read and follow their sources;
The reliability and truthfulness of their sources;
The reputation of their sources among other people whom you trust;
How much effort the poster has put into verifying their own sources' trustworthiness--has the poster been cut'n'pasting without reading or verifying;
How the poster reacts when informed his sources are full of sh*t;
How the poster reacts when informed that (s)he is full of shit;
and many, many, more!
Cheers!