sIf creationism is science, you should be able to answer these questions:
jNice segue but it doesn't help you a bit. You stated that "there are no creationists who do science". The statement is false. A creationist, by definition, is somebody who believes that God created the Universe and all that is in it. That seemingly describes all Christians, except you.
That is not the definition of creationist used in this debate. I am a theistic evolutionist which is a belief in God the creator, but does not make me an apostle of the false prophets: Morris, Ham or Dembski. Can you not be honest in just one part of this debate? Are you just trying to be nasty?
"To prove your statement false, one would simply have to name one creationist who did science. There have been literally millions of them. "
No, you would have to name someone at AIG, ICR or ID that has demonstrated they are able to understand and do scientific inquiry in evolutionary biology or some aspect of it. This does not count chemistry, hydrology or some science outside of this debate, and you know it.
jI leave it as an exercise for you to set your straw dog aflame.
I don't think you have the ability to debate in good faith and I am glad I was able to demonstrate this to the lurkers.
Creationist means what it means. If you mean something else, then I suggest you make that clear in your ranting. Your statement is false. Now way around it. Go whine somewhere else.