> Guess what? You no longer have a mouse trap
That's right. You have something *else*.
You have just debunked the "irreducible complexity" arguement.
You have just debunked the "irreducible complexity" arguement.
Precisely, which is exactly what IC predicts. How the accurate prediction of a theory debunks the theory escapes logic.
Do youself a favor. Read Behe's book. Then you won't look quite so foolish when you utter statements like the above.