Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DannyTN

Of course science would try to understand it. But it would overthrough evolution, particularly if it was a large, multicelled organism lving among us.

Finding a simple, alternate form of biochemistry half a mile down in the earth would merely be interesting.


228 posted on 02/17/2005 11:08:48 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I don't see how it would overthrow evolution at all. There are at least three possibilities.
  1. Such an organism evolved from carbon based life through a seies of mutations. Possibly even rediculously complex mutations, requiring millions and millions of positive mutations, with some features being added and some being substracted until you are left with a silicon based life form, that looks irreducable, but really isn't because it just had to have evolved from something.
  2. Such an organism evolved independently from an earlier silicon based life form. Even though no trace of that earlier life from is found in the fossil record, that's not surprising because the fossil record has gaps.
  3. Such an organism was created by intelligent design, but that's not science, because the designer just might be God and God is "supernatural".

    Give me an example of something that truly disproves evolution. This doesn't.


231 posted on 02/17/2005 11:14:03 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: js1138; DannyTN

I have seen an analogy for the falsification of an idea which I like very much. It is comparable to cutting down a tree. If you cut the trunk of the tree, the tree dies. Similarly if you falsify a basic idea of a theory, the theory is shot. An example of such would be finding a completely different biochemistry existing among the species currently known. If you cut a few smaller branches of the tree, the tree survives. However, if you cut enough of the branches of a tree, the tree will die. Similarly if you falsify a few details of the theory, the theory will still survive. That would be the case, for example, if the idea that birds and mammals both evolved from reptiles were to be falsified. In and of itself, that wouldn't falsify evolution. However, if we found that a large majority of the evolutionary relationships that are theorized by evolution were false, it might start to cast doubt on the whole idea of evolution.


233 posted on 02/17/2005 11:19:32 AM PST by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson