Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
I'll agree that we're individuals, two and not one. But, clearly, I'm over here and you're over there (spatial apartness), and we're both corporeal.

What you sense as spatial/temporal apartness is a manifestation of your vision and mind being limited to four dimensions, three spatial and one temporal.

Well, there's as yet no evidence that there exist more than three spatial dimensions or that there exists more than one temporal dimension. But, even if there were, how would additional dimensions of either sort answer the question I'm asking you, which is this: How can souls be told apart if, as you assert, they're not spatial or temporal or corporeal at all?

What our apartness actually might be - viewed as corporeal form - is a different and quite fascinating subject.

Again, I'm seeking an explanation of how souls can be distinct if they lack corporeal form.

What I'm asking is, how can two souls be distinguished if they're disembodied (lack corporeal characteristics and relations) and lack both spatial and temporal situatedness?

This would require a spirit experiment to recognize others outside space and time, like the thought experiment we just did. But not everyone is able to rapture - or has involuntarily raptured - beyond the physical.

Don't the mods zot séances? (kidding)

Anway, ought I to conclude that you're unable to specify (in words) a principle of individuation for non-corporeal, non-spatial, non-temporal souls? Or have I just failed to discern it in your posts to me?

Best regards...

716 posted on 02/17/2005 11:36:46 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 707 | View Replies ]


To: snarks_when_bored; betty boop
Thank you for your reply!

Well, there's as yet no evidence that there exist more than three spatial dimensions or that there exists more than one temporal dimension

You might want to check out Strominger/Vafa proving Hawking/Bekenstein with string theory: NASA: Superstrings

Anway, ought I to conclude that you're unable to specify (in words) a principle of individuation for non-corporeal, non-spatial, non-temporal souls? Or have I just failed to discern it in your posts to me?

Asked and answered, thus I must conclude you have failed to discern it. It is observational evidence which not every one can duplicate. Then again, most all of us cannot duplicate the observations of astronomers and high energy particle physicists either.

722 posted on 02/17/2005 11:57:43 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 716 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson