[microgood]

I honestly don't know of anyone who uses Darwin's theory to explain how life came about except creationists. Have you honestly ever read Origin of Species?

Anyone who adheres to the notion of speciation is talking about how life came about. Most evolutionists believe in speciation and common ancestry are being dishonest if they claim they are not talking about how life came about. That's why many on FR talk about the "ultimate" origin of life to avoid the appearance of intellectual dishonesty.

[narby]

Most evolutionists believe in speciation and common ancestry are being dishonest if they claim they are not talking about how life came about. That's why many on FR talk about the "ultimate" origin of life to avoid the appearance of intellectual dishonesty.

Well, I guess I'm wierd then. I really haven't a clue as to where life came from. God may certianly have zapped it into place. Or perhaps He took a longer route like He did with Evolutionary species development.

The bottom line there is no real evidence to say where life came from, but there is plenty of evidence of Evolution.

Since I think God's creation is as important to study as God's Word. And since pictures, (and fossils, and DNA, and experiments) tell far more than words, I think that some people's translation of Genesis is just not correct.

I don't think there is a conflict between God's Creation and God's Word. I just think that some mortal humans don't read the words right.