hysterical Darwinites panic

crosswalk ^ | 2004 | creationist

[JohnnyM]

"G-d does not set the course of the world and the things in it to mock the intelligent -- the honest and humble man or woman of intelligence, the genuine scientist."

The Word says otherwise.

1 Cor 1:18-29
18 For the word of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God.
19 For it is written, "I WILL DESTROY THE WISDOM OF THE WISE, AND THE CLEVERNESS OF THE CLEVER I WILL SET ASIDE."
20 Where is the wise man? Where is the scribe? Where is the debater of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?
21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was well-pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
22 For indeed Jews ask for signs and Greeks search for wisdom;
23 but we preach Christ crucified, to Jews a stumbling block and to Gentiles foolishness,
24 but to those who are (AY)the called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ (AZ)the power of God and (BA)the wisdom of God.
25 Because the foolishness of God is wiser than men, and the weakness of God is stronger than men. 26 For consider your calling, brethren, that there were not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble;
27 but God has chosen the foolish things of the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen the weak things of the world to shame the things which are strong,
28 and the base things of the world and the despised God has chosen, the things that are not, so that He may nullify the things that are,
29 so that no man may boast before God.

JM

[metacognative]

You are so hung up on'creationists'. I have known since I studied Clausius that there was an anomaly with living oganisms.

[JohnnyM]

What kooks am I listening to? I have only posted Scripture. I was taught this by the Word, not by man. When you insist upon saying kooks, you insist upon defaming His Word, IN MY EYES.

JM

[JohnnyM]

What kooks am I listening to? I have only posted Scripture. I was taught this by the Word, not by man. When you insist upon saying kooks, you insist upon defaming His Word, IN MY EYES.

JM

[bvw]

Ignorance is not a g-dly virtue. "The wise shall inherit glory: but shame shall be the promotion of fools" -- Proverbs.

[JohnnyM]

Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Anyone who does not value the Word, does not fear the Lord.

JM

[JohnnyM]

Also, your statement was "G-d does not set the course of the world and the things in it to mock the intelligent".

Clearly, God has used foolish things to mock the wise.

JM

[WildTurkey]

What kooks am I listening to? I have only posted Scripture. I was taught this by the Word, not by man. When you insist upon saying kooks, you insist upon defaming His Word, IN MY EYES.

When you reject the teachings of your church and listen to the money hungry kooks on the internet, you get what you pay for.

[WildTurkey]

I have known since I studied Clausius that there was an anomaly with living oganisms.

Please link me to your "Clausius" creationist's website so I can at least figure out what you are trying to say.

[bvw]

To mock the foolishly "wise" -- sure. The ignorant can not know G-d.

[JohnnyM]

I dont cite or get my teachings from websites. I have only used the Word. I have only cited Scripture.

I measure everything anyone says to me with the Scriptures, be it evolutionist or evangelist. I have not rejected anything. The church I attend believes the Word, unlike you. Be that as it may, I do not, by default, take everything the church I attend says as the Truth. Everything they say is measured with the Word of God.

I have only quoted Scripture. To say then, that my information is from kook's, is defaming the Word.

JM

[mississippi red-neck]

Read your link .

Seems to say as best I can tell that they found out how we could mutate from one form of life o another.

They said a crustacean could mutate in to a fruit fly .

Seems to me this means no species has the ability to maintain stability.

I also don't understand that if a crustacean can mutate into a fruit fly then a fruit fly should be able to mutate into a crustacean.

Looks like to me if the entropy law is still considered science today, that the more natural result would be for all species would be to mutate themselves to lower less complicated forms of life than more complicated ones.

Also it seems to me at some point in time the mutant species would be a new single entity species with no readily available partner with which to easily procreate its self in such a quantity that would permit the species survival.

Therefore it would seem to me that all species would tend to mutate themselves out of existence.

Since we have this ability of all species to mutate into some other species I can't understand why with the billions of animals,humans, birds, reptiles and insects born everyday that this doesn't show up on a quite regular basis.

Like I said I'm not very qualified but interested.

[JohnnyM]

No one can know God, except through Jesus Christ. To think you can through intelligence or science, is the height of foolishness.

I find it interesting that you are lecturing me, when you do not see Genesis as valid.

JM

[WildTurkey]

I have only quoted Scripture. To say then, that my information is from kook's, is defaming the Word.

It would be more appropriate to say that you have misinterpreted scripture.

[bvw]

Geneis is valid. Ignorance in reading it is not.

[mississippi red-neck]

The subject is evolution. Please try to stay on topic.

I thought the subject was creation versus evolution.

[WildTurkey]

"Wisdom is the principle thing; therefore get wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding."