hysterical Darwinites panic

crosswalk ^ | 2004 | creationist

[Ichneumon]

the person who sent me a 6 page answer complete with the links, mostly broken

I count 7 that are currently unreachable, out of 243. That's hardly "mostly broken"...

If you're referring to the numerous NCBI links, they're not broken -- they bring the reader to a page which provides the updated link address to the article on their reorganized site. The linked articles are all still easily reachable and readable.

[metacognative]

They know enough common sense to see that water doesn't run uphill and neither does evolution

[Ichneumon]

Dennet wants creationist concentration camps.

Support this slur, or retract it.

I'm OK with Well's evidence.

Even though it's been conclusively debunked numerous times? You're "OK" with that? Oh, right -- you prefer his conclusions, even though they're faulty and demonstrably dishonest. I understand -- that's a common feeling among anti-evolutionists, where "doctrinal purity" is more important than accuracy and honesty. Thanks for making your preferences clear.

[bvw]

His Academy is populated with straw men. It is no wonder we mere shadows on some cave wall he rarely visits are unable to catch his eye, for he prefers his company of straw men, even while traveling. There is not the hint of a shadow of some unseen light but that he can place another straw man to block it out.

[WildTurkey]

Aditionally, I am uncertain why you feel the need to start a dialogue concerning my question concerning a comment made by someone other than yourself

If you don't want people commenting about your postings, use FReepmail.

[bvw]

For a "slur" YOU ask a withdrawal? Look to you own made against others. You employ two modes of attack synchoronously -- doc dump and slur.

Retract your slur against me, you unevolved swine!

[PatrickHenry]

Glued ... to ... trees!

Clearly, evolution having been decisively debunked, we can now start studying real science: Big Daddy?

[185JHP]

BTTT

[185JHP]

BTTT

[rdb3]

Meanwhile there is no such thing as a "theory of evolution." There are not enough scientific facts to back it up. What you have is a philosophy couched in scientific terms, for it is nothing more than a hopeful recapitulation of history that is not, and cannot be, the object of empirical science. Even a little child knows that just because two things look the same they do not necessarily have a common source. Evolution, insofar as it attempts to tell history beyond what has been recorded by man, does not deserve to have the word "theory" associated with it.

Educated fools are nothing new. Let them keep their philosphies in a classroom of their own so the curious can partake as they wish, but please do not consider the rest of the world stupid for rejecting the charade.

---

Woo, boy! You brought the noise with that one. I like it.

[js1138]

Anyone who believes the Rev Moon is the second coming doesn't need evidence.

[PatrickHenry]

... you unevolved swine!

You've got him foaming at the mouth and chewing the carpet.

[PatrickHenry]

Observe the irony ... The title of this thread's lead article mentions: "Hysterical Darwinites."

[SpeakingUp]

I suspect the purpose of all the responses is to discourage comments. Bye bye and thanks for proving the original post.

My last word, but feel free to fire away again.

[185JHP]

BUMP

[Right Wing Professor]

He knows what an ichneumon is.

Sheesh.

[Right Wing Professor]

Right now how many genomes are sequenced?

It's in the hundreds.

[Right Wing Professor]

See what I mean, you darwinuts don't care to discuss the modern scintific problems with evolution. It's all religion and denigration.

There are no modern scientific problems with evolution. Attacks on evolution are indeed all religion and denigration.