Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zim 'to take all white farms'
News24 ^ | Dec 15, 2004

Posted on 12/15/2004 3:01:24 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: SF Republican

bump to that look into the history of how Cecil Rhodes treated white farmers who stood in his way.


41 posted on 12/15/2004 4:19:37 PM PST by cyborg (http://www.zimbabwesituation.com/flamelily.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This problem rightly belongs in the foreign policy sphere of the British Commonwealth of Nations which means that it's up to countries like Canada to take decisive action.

Which is why we're where we are today.

42 posted on 12/15/2004 4:26:17 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

Tragedy, no other word.
Same thing starting in Namibia and South Africa.
Apparently Zambia and Mozambique are welcoming some of the displaced farmers, need their expertise.


43 posted on 12/15/2004 6:03:15 PM PST by 1066AD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

bttt


44 posted on 12/15/2004 6:23:40 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clearsight

"Land reform" has been legal in the United States since 1984, when the U.S. Supreme Court in Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff held that it was lawful for the state of Hawaii to condemn the land from Person A and then transfer it to Person B, as long as there was a "conceivable" economic basis for doing so. Economically benefiting Person B is sufficient, says the Supreme Court, because that would improve the general welfare

This case has formed the basis for all sorts of abuses, primarily large companies paying off municipal governments (either directly or through promises that it will "increase the tax base") to seize property and then transfer the property to them.

The issue is again up in the Supreme Court, but I wouldn't hold my breath that the Court will restore the Public Use Clause to the Constitution.


45 posted on 12/15/2004 7:02:24 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
We were expecting this.

Those who thought that they could come to an accommodation with Mugabe's thugs were totally out of touch with reality.

46 posted on 12/15/2004 8:27:57 PM PST by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Mugabe has singlehandedly destroyed the entire economy of this country. He has let the mobs run wild and steal the farms of the whites and the country has gone from a exporter of farm products to an importer with a wreck for an economy.
Mugabe also forced out all of the skilled trades people and merchants.
Zimbabwe is now just another African basket case run by a dictator.
Give Africa another generation or two and I predict it will finally revert back to a nation of warring tribes.
I can't think of one country there now that isn't now worse off than they were before the European nations finally gave up their colonialism after W.W. II.
47 posted on 12/15/2004 8:35:44 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson