Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LEFTISTS HAVE SIDED WITH RADICAL ISLAM
National Post (Canada) ^ | November 27, 2004 | Robert Fulford

Posted on 11/27/2004 2:09:42 PM PST by GMMAC

LEFTISTS HAVE SIDED WITH RADICAL ISLAM

By Robert Fulford
National Post
November 27, 2004

The American left of the 21st century has reached the point where it defines itself by what it loathes. Leftists who once dreamt of a better world now spend their passion on their antipathies and seldom even mention social progress. The Democratic party's left wing no longer has any purpose except keeping conservatives out of power, so far a strikingly unsuccessful project.

Even so, the U.S. left remains influential. Between elections it may look like no more than a shaky alliance of Marxist professors, guilt-ridden millionaires, the Ford Foundation and Barbra Streisand; but David Horowitz, an articulate right-wing propagandist, declines to take it lightly. He knows that since the 1960s left-wing ideas have helped shape the American imagination. Leftist assumptions become mainstream assumptions.

Horowitz's new book, Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left (Regnery), describes the latest blind alley down which the left has stampeded. Put plainly, American leftists responded to 9/11 by going over to the side of the enemy, radical Islam. They are captives of what Horowitz calls "neo-communism," a combination of romantic yearning for the Soviet empire and unreasoning hatred of capitalism and U.S. power. In practice, this means they sympathize with any force Washington opposes.

After 9/11, when the Americans began fighting the Taliban, leftist demonstrators declared the war in Afghanistan "racist." As Horowitz says, "Within weeks of the most heinous attack on America in its history, radicals had turned their own country into villains."

He describes the bewilderment of Paul Berman, a New York writer who has spent decades searching for a humane leftist politics. Berman was attending the 2002 Socialist Scholars Conference in New York when the crowd applauded an Egyptian novelist's defence of a Palestinian suicide murderer.

How could that happen? How could secular socialists sit "in comradely assemblage," as Berman wrote, while someone defended the random murder of women and children in the name of God? Horowitz explains that radicals believe Western capitalism actually causes Islamic fanaticism. If capitalism wasn't so evil, the reasoning goes, then Arabs wouldn't turn to Islamism. Therefore, "The liberation of the world from private property ... will liberate Islamic fanatics from the need to be Islamic and fanatic."

In Hollywood the fight against terrorism has attracted only meagre support. Even when Theo Van Gogh, a Dutch filmmaker, was assassinated for making a documentary in defence of Islamic women, Hollywood showed little interest. As Bridget Johnson pointed out on Wednesday in The Wall Street Journal, "We've heard nary a peep from Hollywood about the Van Gogh slaying." Johnson quoted a screenwriter, Roger L. Simon: "It's stunning how silent the American artistic community, Hollywood in particular, has been about the murder. Do they care someone was killed for making a film which protested violent abuse against women? Are they even interested?"

Horowitz can explain that Hollywood's political posture derives from a tradition created by communists and renewed by the New Left.

Hollywood leftists remain mute because they desperately fear being associated, even in a distant way, with a cause that Washington has adopted. They hate George W. Bush much more than they fear the Islamists.

Unholy Alliance is directed at conservatives and those of independent mind who are open to persuasion. Horowitz can hardly expect a fair-minded reading by leftists, who consider him an apostate who turned in fury against his original beliefs. The son of two communists who lost their teaching jobs during the McCarthy period, he was a New Left journalist in the 1960s and a passionate supporter of the Black Panthers.

His close scrutiny of the Panthers, and the way leftists and the mainstream media treated them, eventually made him question every political opinion he owned. He came to believe the Panthers were a murderous street gang who hid their thuggishness behind Marxist rhetoric. Many of his leftist friends, while knowing about the crimes of the Panthers, chose to ignore them, just as communists of two decades before had overlooked the crimes of Stalin. And the mainstream media, having bought the leftist propaganda about the Panthers as heroes, refused to confront facts that would disturb the mythology.

Horowitz was the exception. That experience turned him into a right-wing pamphleteer -- a supporter of free enterprise, an enemy of America's enemies and an unrelenting critic of his old friends on the left. He's an interesting commentator who writes with an angry but controlled animation. And he's one journalist who can say with a reasonable claim to truth that he hasn't been seriously wrong since the 1960s.


TOPICS: Canada; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bookreview; horowitz; hypocrisy; islam; liberals; napalminthemorning; religionofpeace; sympathizers; theleft; trop; unholyalliance; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Note: posted url only confirms article's source as The Nation Post has opted for a pay-to-view website.
1 posted on 11/27/2004 2:09:42 PM PST by GMMAC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
"Neo-coms"
I love it...

2 posted on 11/27/2004 2:17:14 PM PST by Doctor Raoul ( ----- HERTZ: We're #1 ----- AVIS: We're #2 We Try Harder ----- CBS: We're #3 We LIE Harder)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

The left is truly an enemy of reality, of common sense and what is right.


3 posted on 11/27/2004 2:21:51 PM PST by Dallas59 ("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Both should be destroyed.


4 posted on 11/27/2004 2:21:56 PM PST by Mr. Keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Since the core of liberalism is the hatred of the one true God, they will side with any enemy of God. In this case, Islam.


5 posted on 11/27/2004 2:26:21 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
"Within weeks of the most heinous attack on America in its history, radicals had turned their own country into villains."

How long would gay and atheist leftists stay alive under muslim rule? The left's "death wish" mentality of siding with the very people who openly call for their death is clear evidence of the diseased minds of leftists.

6 posted on 11/27/2004 2:29:29 PM PST by Noachian (A Democrat, by definition, is a Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

The Left = The Fourth Estate™ = The Fifth Column™ = The Enemy Within™ = Needs Complete & Total Destruction/ Annihilation.


7 posted on 11/27/2004 2:29:34 PM PST by 7.62 x 51mm (• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

"They hate George W. Bush much more than they fear the Islamists."

Exactly. It truly is sickening how lefties can IGNORE the attacks and threats around the world, all to serve an agenda: ousting President Bush.
They do not get it at all. I honestly think many of them believe they are immune, and would somehow be spared should they ever fall into the clutches of an Islamofascist.


8 posted on 11/27/2004 2:33:45 PM PST by KJC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

Whoa! The enemy within unmasked. I knew if I hung around here long enough I'd hear someone say the secret word. NEOCOMS. Word for the day. Most excellent. Now everything makes sense.


9 posted on 11/27/2004 2:37:26 PM PST by Eastbound ("Neither a Scrooge nor a Patsy be")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

....and this is news because?


10 posted on 11/27/2004 2:37:41 PM PST by freakboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

"LEFTISTS HAVE SIDED WITH RADICAL ISLAM"


So, where has this guy been for the last 12 years?


11 posted on 11/27/2004 2:42:58 PM PST by HighWheeler ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Keys

Thanks for having the courage to say it. "Both should be destroyed!" - Absolutely. What is the title of Hannity's book on this subject? ......"Let Freedom Ring....How to defeat terrorism, despotism......and LIBERALISM!" I'm not sure that's the right title, but it's close.


12 posted on 11/27/2004 2:43:07 PM PST by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

I've purchased Horowitz's book and look forward to reading it.


13 posted on 11/27/2004 2:47:12 PM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh
So right you are!
Some things never change.

The Right and the Left.
How Jesus gave them their name.

Mattew 25
25:33 And he shall set * the sheep on his right hand, but
the goats on the left.
25:34 Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand,
Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom
prepared for you from the foundation of the world:
25:35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was
thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye
took me in:
25:36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited
me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
25:37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord,
when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and
gave thee drink ?
25:38 * When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in ? or
naked, and clothed thee?
25:39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came
unto thee?
25:40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily
I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of
the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
25:41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand,
Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared
for the devil and his angels:
25:42 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was
thirsty, and ye gave me no drink:
25:43 I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and
ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
25:44 Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when
saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or
naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
25:45 Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto
you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of
these, ye did it not to me.
25:46 And these shall go away into everlasting punishment:
but the righteous into life eternal.
The KJV Strong's Version
14 posted on 11/27/2004 2:47:52 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

The anybody but Bush crowd has reverted back to being "Anybody but America".


15 posted on 11/27/2004 2:48:17 PM PST by Mike Darancette (RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unam Sanctam
Left Illusions.
I am reading it now.
The sequel to radical son.
Dynamite.
16 posted on 11/27/2004 2:53:35 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC

"Many of his leftist friends, knowing of the crimes of the Panthers, chose to ingore them..."
Read...Hillary Rodham Clinton


17 posted on 11/27/2004 3:12:41 PM PST by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
"LEFTISTS HAVE SIDED WITH RADICAL ISLAM"

Well, knock me over with a feather! (Of course, my tagline is suspicously similar)

18 posted on 11/27/2004 3:52:16 PM PST by Enterprise (The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMAC
Islamists are patriarchal; leftists are not.
Islamists are draconian; leftists are not.
Islamists are theocratic; leftists are not.
Islamists are intolerant; leftists are not.
Islamists are anti-American...

Common ground at last!

19 posted on 11/27/2004 3:55:39 PM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
What set David Horowitz off was the murder of
his dear friend Betty Van Patter.
David got Betty to do bookkeeping work for
The Black Panthers and they repaid him by murdering her.
The left cared nothing for Betty and and began to
shun David after he discovered the Panthers had murdered
dozens of innocent others.
After Betty's bludgeoned body was discovered in the SanFrancisco bay It took David ten years to recover and start writing again.
20 posted on 11/27/2004 3:56:26 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson