[Pukin Dog]

First, (and I really don't know why I bother) the things that I share on this web site do not require your belief in order to be valid. I do not appreciate your silly attempts to appear knowledgeable by tossing in the Strike Eagle reference when any fool knows it would not apply to any of my points. Your agreement is just not required, I would have slept fine tonight without it. The plain fact, is that only 3 or 4 people on this thread will EVER know just how good the Raptor is, so don't feel bad. You wont be getting the data until the Raptor is long into its operational career. We cant all have a fan club, so just get over it.

[RFEngineer]

"First, (and I really don't know why I bother) the things that I share on this web site do not require your belief in order to be valid."

LOL! If you can't reference it, just admit it, instead of getting all indignant that someone isn't following proper fan-club etiquitte.

Maybe you do have this sort of inside info, maybe you don't. Since you can't reference it, we'll never know if it's true, and if so, to what degree, will we?

Your 7:1 analogy depends very heavily on specific scenarios that would be contained in any reference that you may or may not have. I'm sincerely interested in that data - and don't require your consent to be curious about it - besides you DID bring it up.

Right now, you are providing as much hard data on this as Quix.....(hey, lighten up a little!)