Posted on 11/24/2004 9:34:43 PM PST by FairOpinion
Soros increased the rate of gay sodomy in the Ukraine, I take it? Color me skeptical.
You are so correct about Soros trying to destroy Ukraine.
AIDS is worse in Putin's Russia.
Understand?
The presence of Russian troops on the ground is a pretty clear indicator of who it is that is trying to steal the election.
If Yushchenko was the one stuffing the ballot boxes, Kuchma should be able to call up Uk troops and police to suppress the rebellion.
The fact that he is mobilizing Russian troops rather than his own suggests that he can't be sure his own forces would remain loyal, or even neutral. That suggests that real support in Ukraine is with Yushchenko.
Elections are always about choosing between flawed alternatives. When Putin is the lesser of evils, I am happy to support Putin. I have frequently and readily supported him in some arguments, but this is not one of those. Russian troops have no good reason to be in Ukraine. They are there to protect Kuchma and Yanukovich from the Ukrainians because Ukrainian troops won't.
How is the collectivist impulse encourgaged by reducing the population? If I wanted to go to this rather insane and unverified paradigm, I would have thought the opposite.
Soros IMHO.
But the guy is hairless - a total turnoff.
It's called control.
why is it that you keep repeating this BS??
it is NOT about exit polls, it is about calculated fraud. every country in the free world is challengin the results. stop spouting your pro-communist crap.
But you have failed in your musings to explain just why Soros would want to free the planet from homo sapien rug rats
This is just like, when Gore, instead of conceding the election, put the country through recounts after recounts.
Wrong. I'm hearing all sorts of other screams (multiple voting, fraudulent results, destruction of legitimate results, violence, intimidation, etc. etc. etc.)
At what point does someone become an idiot for insisting that Soros must be wrong about everything?
Conservative are supposed to stand for something, not against someone.
If Canada, Colin Powell, the rest of the Bush Administration, Vaclav Havel, the EU, and the Pope all agree on something, (in other words, all Western moderates left and right from the top half of the earth) I'm liable to give it the benefit of the doubt. If Soros stands next to the Pope, does that mean we should stand with Lucifer and Putin?
this is nothing like gore. i have asked you several times....why do you ignore that everybody but kuchma refuse to acknowledge the validity of the election? why cant you answer that simple question?
INTERNATIONAL OBSERVERS FROM THE UKRAINE CITE EXAMPLES OF VOTING FRAUD - IN THE UNITED STATES
http://www.moderateindependent.com/v2i22jthoreau.htm
A delegation of international election observers from the Ukraine harshly criticized the recent U.S. electoral process, with one saying, "It reminds me of the worst examples of suppression and dirty tricks under the former Soviet regimes."
Soros is a parent of the culture of death which the Pope so frequently mentions. I doubt they would stand together on anything.
THANK YOU! why are these simple facts ignore by so many on these boards?
Oops -- that was a parody.
But the principle remains, the same people also claim fraud in the US elections.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.