[RaceBannon]

Umm, did you read what you just said?

I know hardly nothing about her life style or relationships other than the fact that she is A LESBIAN,and I think that is significant in showing that she is not in "open rebellion" against traditional life and that she is not pushing a gay agneda for America.

Being an openly Lesbian talk show host, publically proclaiming her Lesbianism, unexcuseably Pro-Abortion...that is NOT Open Rebellion???

You just demonstrated why it is so hard to get these points across about how important it is to choose the characterof a person we look up to and seek advice from in our present world, let alone who we elect to ofice! (Schwarzennegar vs McClintock)

[ontos-on]

I think your meaning for "rebellion" is what is different than what I orignally understood. Someone like Sullivan and the homosexual activists are trying to push an agenda. Bruce is not going ot hide it, but also not push it. That is the right mix in my opinion. Unless you actually mean that contrasting perspectives are not to be allowed to surface in your society.

I respect your instincts here, but I think it important to specify if you actually believe a person should be free to be a homosexual and actually to say so without official condemnation resulting from that exposure? What is your view. Here it is important to be definite as to what rebellion you mean. I think you cannot import to it the meaning you mentioned when adding that you thought she is in "sin". Do you wan to police the public sphere to keep out the sinful???

[watchdog_writer]

HELLO:

IT'S NOT WHO SHE IS, IT'S THE INDICTMENT SHE PROVES ABOUT THE RADICAL GAY/LESBIANS.

REALLY, YOU NEED TO KNOW A LOT MORE ABOUT HER BEFORE YOU DAMAGE A ALLY,

IF THEY ARE NOT AGAINST US THEY ARE WITH US! REMEMBER?