[Poohbah]

more along the lines that Mr. Sites life is in danger being around the Marines... I think the pentagon should revoke his embed privilages for his own safety.

So you're endorsing the idea that the Marines need to retaliate against this guy?

If the deed was righteous, then what's the basis for retaliation?

[Americanwolf]

No I am not advocating that the Marines retaliate against him I am just looking at it realistically... If you have a bunch of pissed off Marines that think a buddy has been slighted they may decide to take out vigilante justice... It is not something I would personally condone but to be realistic about it it could happen.

I personally think the Marine was rightous in what he did. His fellow Marines may see it that way too, but they may also think that this guy is a Media hack from the MSM that is trying to paint The Marines in a bad light in Iraq.. There are thousand of Great Soldiers in Iraq doing their job, but it only takes on that thinks he is being slighted to make a stupid mistake and harm Mr. Sites and for his own safety I think the pentagon need to remove him... Is that clear enough of an explanation?

[Beckwith]

So you're endorsing the idea that the Marines need to retaliate against this guy?

No, I endorse the idea of crushing my enemies, see them driven before me, and hear the lamentations of their women!

Is there a double standard at work here?