[JeffAtlanta]

"Extreme circumstances" was not an option given.

That's why its sensible to group them with the "Should not be permitted" crowd. As I said in a previous post, people who would choose an option that there should be stricter limits on alcohol consumption certainly wouldn't infer it mean an absolute ban except for life saving measures.

Anytime anything is banned in the US, it is still generally available for life saving procedures.

And as I've said before, if you want to believe your numbers then a constitutional amendment to overturn Roe V Wade should be a snap. Why waste your time with the SCOTUS when you could override them directly?

[sitetest]

Dear JeffAtlanta,

"Anytime anything is banned in the US, it is still generally available for life saving procedures."

Not quite.

Organ stealing is (for now) banned. Even if you need to steal someone's organ to save your own life.

In the meanwhile, in various polls, large majorities have answered that they would endorse specific restrictions on abortions that would be impermissible under Roe.

Roe's gotta go!


sitetest

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

That's why its sensible to group them with the "Should not be permitted" crowd.

Sensible only to someone with an interest in spinning the numbers into pro-Roe sentiment.

I choose not to spin the poll in either direction. Without a three-exception option, the poll is fatally flawed.

That's why I have twice pointed out to you the Pro-Life v. Pro-Choice Opinion Dynamics poll from April, 2004 to counter your assertion of 60+% support for Roe.