Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JeffAtlanta
Those you listed are called "extreme circumstances"

"Extreme circumstances" was not an option given.

1,468 posted on 11/14/2004 12:48:42 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1418 | View Replies ]


To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
"Extreme circumstances" was not an option given.

That's why its sensible to group them with the "Should not be permitted" crowd. As I said in a previous post, people who would choose an option that there should be stricter limits on alcohol consumption certainly wouldn't infer it mean an absolute ban except for life saving measures.

Anytime anything is banned in the US, it is still generally available for life saving procedures.

And as I've said before, if you want to believe your numbers then a constitutional amendment to overturn Roe V Wade should be a snap. Why waste your time with the SCOTUS when you could override them directly?
1,476 posted on 11/14/2004 12:56:16 PM PST by JeffAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1468 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson