Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/05/2004 8:44:13 AM PST by RightSideRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: RightSideRedux

They'll NEVER get "it"


2 posted on 11/05/2004 8:46:32 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

Insanity must be contagious and running rampant among the democrats.


3 posted on 11/05/2004 8:49:06 AM PST by Trepz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

Q:"What are the best things in life, Conan?"
A:"To defeat your enemies in battle and to hear the lamentations of their women."
Heh.


6 posted on 11/05/2004 8:50:33 AM PST by RKV ( He who has the guns, makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
Already, the president is claiming a mandate for partial Social Security privatization

Oh, yeah? When did he say that? Even after the election the left continues to lie.

7 posted on 11/05/2004 8:51:09 AM PST by Shenandoah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
Four republican backed, religious fundamentalist christian inspired companies have cornered the touch screen voting machine market.

This conspiracy theory really cracks me up. If the touch-screens were tampered with, why did Kerry win virtually the identical states that Gore won? Why did Bush carry Ohio, where 70% of the voters used punch card ballots? Why didn't Diebold and the others set up the touch screens to make it a 50 state sweep. Heck, they could have even fixed the machines in Washington, D.C. to overcome that 90-10 edge they let Kerry have. Wait, I know--they fixed the rsults but didn't want it to be too obvious, so they let Kerry win just enough electoral votes to allay suspicion while still providing Bush with a mandate. Yeah, that's the ticket!

8 posted on 11/05/2004 8:51:10 AM PST by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
The likely outcome is that W runs again in 2008 and wins.

Uh... Ok. I don't see it as being a likely scenario, but ooooookay.

11 posted on 11/05/2004 8:53:23 AM PST by Chad Fairbanks (CBS - We Distort, You Deride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
The likely outcome is that W runs again in 2008 and wins. (source)

Unngh.

12 posted on 11/05/2004 8:54:17 AM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
The likely outcome is that W runs again in 2008 and wins.

It is so... funny to see the left going into full delusional conspiracy mode.

Everything I have read and studied about the dynamics of groups and true believers indicates that this party will continue its self-destruction for then next two decades. The red diaper babies and 60's revolutionaries will have to die off. They will never give up on their delusions; they will only continue to develop ever more delusional conspiracy theories to explain why their last delusions never worked.

They could get away with this stuff when the old media was dominant enough to cover for them. Now they can not.

13 posted on 11/05/2004 8:54:53 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
I do think we have to understand that Rove has changed the make up electorate.

Rove didn't change the make up of the electorate. He uncovered it. The only way to change the make up of the electorate is to win the war of ideas and it started with Reagan. Shipdits!

15 posted on 11/05/2004 8:59:13 AM PST by rudypoot (We, the american people, made it clear where we stand. We stand with Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

Oh please post more. This stuff is just too entertaining.


17 posted on 11/05/2004 9:00:31 AM PST by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

"Out Jesused" ???

Remind us again which candidate turned a church service into a political rally every Sunday?


18 posted on 11/05/2004 9:02:16 AM PST by IamConservative (People with courage and character always seem sinister to the rest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

The problem is they believe in progress as the define it. They thing any as 'progressives' they have a monopoly on what progress is and where it goes. They assume any change or trend away from anything in the past is a good one and then they ignore the lessons of history that prove the wrong. They have some misguided faith that society evolves toward something and they think it is a good something. All the while they are dead set on believing that any smart thinking person who looks at the facts will come to the same viewpoint as them. And they they define 'facts' as what ever the media tells them.


19 posted on 11/05/2004 9:05:33 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

I heard an angry SKerry "aide" say that Kerry was the "secular" Candidate...In his warped mind America is becoming Ayatollahland!


21 posted on 11/05/2004 9:09:13 AM PST by eleni121 (NO more reaching out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

*Shaking head*

It's rather like the male/female, mars/venus thing isn't it? Almost like they speak a different language and the universal translator is offline. It's truly mindboggling how these people can say and write what they do with a straight face! Amazing...


23 posted on 11/05/2004 9:10:41 AM PST by TChris (You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
The likely outcome is that W runs again in 2008 and wins.

Huh? What did I miss?

Four republican backed, religious fundamentalist christian inspired companies have cornered the touch screen voting machine market.

What's so surprising about the leadership of major established tech companies being Republicans? It's not lik they're startup software companies founded by college kids in their dorm rooms.

29 posted on 11/05/2004 9:21:48 AM PST by atomicpossum (They pelted us with rocks and garbage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
Classic Quotes from the Imploding Left

Classic quote from the Exploding Right:

Democrats were ABORTED

And it was election day's late term abortion.

35 posted on 11/05/2004 9:34:39 AM PST by Anticommie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
"respect for LIFE on our terms"

That's a mighty revealing comment.

36 posted on 11/05/2004 9:35:50 AM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
Pregnant single women with low income and little access to affordable healthcare are more likely to have an abortion. ...

Unbelievable. Where is this guy living? Poor women are more likely to have children out of wedlock, making their financial situation worse, perpetuating the cycle of poverty. The solution is not more abortions or offering publically-funded abortion services, but convincing the women having kids with no means of support to simply not have those children while they are not in a financial position to support them. Most abortions are elective procedures by those with a means to pay for them, who make a conscious choice to do away with the unborn child out of expediency or convenience.

38 posted on 11/05/2004 9:39:18 AM PST by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux

What they don't understand is that America rejected their Socialist program. America loves freedom.


39 posted on 11/05/2004 9:41:39 AM PST by DJ MacWoW (Liberals have no logic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightSideRedux
I love it!! Keep making silly excuses and ignore the real reasons and root causes, and we'll keep winning the elections.
40 posted on 11/05/2004 9:47:23 AM PST by LIConFem (Ex abusu non arguitur in usum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson