Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
The folks connected with the film say Nichole was so "careful to protect the young actor's innocence."

Did Nicole not realize that when the world sees this film somebody is going go out of their way to attack 'the young actor's innocence'? He will forever be known as the boy who was in that sex movie with Nicole Kidman. Even Gary Coleman never had his innocence stolen in such a way.

Ain't it sad what people will do for a buck?

9 posted on 10/29/2004 6:11:28 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox
Ten-year-olds in public schools learn plenty these days. Not only is innocence lost but it is replaced by perverted facts and something ugly.

The author keeps using the term "skinny dipping" but that is usually much more innocently done in a lake or pool than in a tub. A tub involves very close contact. Likewise a french kiss is more troubling than the nudity.

But in defense of Nicole I must say that she has done less harm than those who promote teaching troubled adolescents that homosexuality is normal and healthy. If I were going to spit upon someone I would sooner pick Planned Parenthood, One in Teen, The Girl Scout national leadership or the National Education Association.
25 posted on 10/29/2004 6:28:13 AM PDT by Monterrosa-24 (Technology advances but human nature is dependably stagnant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson