Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2

""He doesn't quite know what he's doing, which is good.""

Which makes you, Nicole, an absolute pig.


4 posted on 10/29/2004 6:04:38 AM PDT by OpusatFR (Let me repeat this: the web means never having to swill leftist garbage again. Got it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: OpusatFR
...

Hmmm, suppose he's a quick learner?

19 posted on 10/29/2004 6:19:37 AM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: OpusatFR

""He doesn't quite know what he's doing, which is good.""

Which makes you, Nicole, an absolute pig.


......... EXACTLY! Nicole didn't realize it, but she admits that THERE WAS something wrong about this boy playing this role otherwise she would not have made that remark. Talk about contradicting ones self. Duh for Kidman. Such a dissappointment.




42 posted on 10/29/2004 8:15:44 AM PDT by SunnySide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: OpusatFR

let it first be said that I am firmly against sex outside of marriage and I am firmly against incest and abuse. None may not claim I am stating otherwise without biting their tongue. I know you only want what's best for your children, you are to be commended for that virtue. But I assist in warning you of a terrible error in your judgement. You are in danger of inadvertently harming them.

Affection is MORAL. Lascivious, forced sex on children is IMMORAL. Do not confuse the two. Anger and raw emotion towards previous acts of child abuse, however justified and right it is to have those emotions for the actual case of child abuse, does not constitute a moral reflection and it's no excuse for trying to obliterate something natural and healthy. If emotions are motherly and benign, then they are NOT sexual in the context hereby used. You are confusing abuse with motherly touch (essential for the emotional growth and development of a child). You are making as John put it "good, evil and evil, good". The physical neglect of a child is evil, they are both against the teachings of the Bible and anything resembling common sense. Nudism (not lust) is also the goal of a healthy, moral society. Nudism is truth, nothing concealed. Only a devil conceals. God has given us the story of Adam and Eve to show us our sin. Adam and Eve invented cloths in the warmth of paradise (without the intended purpose of preserving body heat) and in doing so they originated the dark path for mankind to follow. How can deceit (covering one's self up) and trying to deny God's gifts be a good thing, be a moral thing? What next, outlawing breast feeding because it involves physical contact between mother and child? Incriminating human beings because they are not ethereal? Incriminating those who love God because they have not neglected him in the name of his own morality? Certainly you know the answer and realize the contradiction in that last question.

These are people in a bath tub and there is no sexual abuse, right? There is no hitting, strangling, piercing, stabbing, kicking, screaming, swearing, slapping, gnawing, mangling, shooting, burning, grinding, or murder. What in the name of God, then, are you attacking? The human form? The recognition of the human form? WHY? How can you believe this? What beauty is there in mangling a child with a flogging stick or treating him like some uncontrollably promiscuous and demonic virus to be molded and crushed? Attacking the human being made in the Lord's image would seem to be evil in every sense of the word. Am I wrong about this? is this not true?

An innocent child is born evil? How can this be? If an innocent child is born with evil, born with the tendency to lust then there would be no innocence and all murder and mayhem would be the will of God. But this is not so. Right?

I am ignorant, lost, and confused within this ideal of yours. You may now challenge my statment. If you try to defame me, keep in mind that you will accomplish nothing. I am a follower of Jesus Christ, a healer of illnesses, and a believer in the redemption of mankind from original sin. Your malice will have no more affect on my thoughts and beliefs than the breath of a mewling calf. You may choose a lifetime of anger and war if you wish. That would be a truly unfruitful sacrifice of your purpose in this life. Your children need your compassion.

I am growing weary, for my fellow humans here seem to be losing their humanity. Now is the time to choose your approach: hatred, defense, or to leave it be and discover the truth on your own. I will not fail in creating a safe habitat for children all over the world to live and grow, even if others fail them.


70 posted on 04/20/2005 9:18:40 PM PDT by Gava
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson