[Pukin Dog]

Whether my posts are credible to you mean nothing to me. Thats a lot of words in your post, saying not much, but my my reply to you is that if you don't care to believe what I write, that is your prerogative. The rest of your post is pure invective. You have no special insight into my reasons for posting, so don't try to imply that you do.

Also, if you care to direct another rant at me, and not at the subject of the thread, you can mail me directly, instead of acting like a pussy on this thread. Got it, James?

[James Coburn]

I noticed that you had nothing to say about the subject of my post. The bullet points I listed are factually correct. You wrote these things. You have been raising the hopes of Freepers for awhile now, and nothing has materialized.

I used this current thread because you brought up the subject of "tin foil". Creating a separate thread for a rant (even thought I feel the rant is justified) is against this board's policies.

I am not the only one on this board who has noticed your posts regarding a Bush surprise. I have seen others ask you directly "...is this it?....is this it?" only to have you respond with "No Comment;)" or something else indicating that "it" was coming. Very coy remarks indeed.

This election season is hard enough on everybody without having some person pretending to be "connected" giving out false information. It is very disappointing when the promised event does not occur.

I can't speak for everyone on this board, but I think most would agree that what they want is honest observation and truthful information; not name dropping and "tin foil" prognostications.

I apologize to others on this board for this complaint. I just feel that this is something that needed to be said.

[numberonepal]

Got it, James?

Boy I knew James had opened it up with that winded comment. That is no way to talk to the Dog, man.