[airborne]

You wrote- "-This is bull. As discussed last night, 9 members of a Russian embassy convoy were hit on 4/6/03 heading to Syria. They were not evacuated... they were there.-"

From the article-

"I can state officially that the Russian Defense Ministry and its structures couldn't have been involved in the disappearance of the explosives, because all Russian military experts left Iraq when the international sanctions were introduced during the 1991 Gulf War (news - web sites)," he told The Associated Press.

You call them members of a "Russian embassy convoy" and they refer to "Russian military experts". Not a lie, but not exactly the truth, is it.

[DaveMSmith]

I'm not pretending to imagine the skillset of a 'diplomat' stationed at the Russian embassy in Iraq in 2002/early 2003.

I am aware, however, how language and 'titles' are used to deceive and obsecure the truth.

I remember my initial reaction to the Russian convoy - 'what the heck are THEY doing there'? That question still hasn't been answered.