Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jorsett

"Those inside George W. Bush's White House believed that the atrocity demanded a forceful response"

So why was one not forthcoming?


3 posted on 10/24/2004 7:41:51 AM PDT by KantianBurke (Am back but just for a short while)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KantianBurke
So why was one not forthcoming?

The touchy-feely crowd won the day.

The Iraqi insurgents are going to get clobbered

BIG TIME

after Nov. 2, whoever wins the election.

6 posted on 10/24/2004 7:44:10 AM PDT by CROSSHIGHWAYMAN (Anybody but Kerry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke

"So why was one not forthcoming?"

Because we have an opposition dedicated to itself and not the interests of the country or individual Americans and which will use any even inevitable difficulty or reversal to their advantage, regardless of its effects.


8 posted on 10/24/2004 7:46:00 AM PDT by jim macomber (Author: "Bargained for Exchange", "Art & Part", "A Grave Breach" http://www.jamesmacomber.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: KantianBurke
Those inside George W. Bush's White House believed that the atrocity demanded a forceful response"

So why was one not forthcoming?



You apparently have not been paying attention if you think this. There is a HUGE difference between a "Forceful response" and "mindless revenge" or "counter atrocity"
23 posted on 10/24/2004 8:02:35 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Vote Bush 2004-We cannot survive a 9-10 President in a 9-11 World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson