He ought to kick his butt MATRIX-STYLE!!*!*!*!*!**! That would be so KEWL!!*!!*!!*!*!**!*!*![/twelve-year-old boy mode off] Now, back in reality...
Posted on 10/08/2004 8:50:27 AM PDT by bigjoesaddle
Kerry started winning the primaries when his Vietnam buddy, whose life he saved, came up with him on stage in Iowa, telling how Kerry saved his life
He was a war Hero, so he was TOUGH!
Then the Swiftboat vets threw a wrench in it.
His numbers went down, not because he lied, (undecided voters expect politicians to lie) but because he RETREATED! The numbers went down because he was now a WHIMP.
The republican Convention was full of HIGH TESTICULAR MASS… tough talk from all, including President Bush, so he, and the party, looked TOUGH!
The FIRST DEBATE, Kerry talked TOUGH, a strong, booming voice, even if it was lies and BS, (he talks eloquently out of BOTH SIDES of his mouth), the undecided voter doesn’t care, ( they don’t REALLY know what the hells going on anyway) so Kerry looked TOUGH!
Bush, with his 5 second pauses, and his “What about Poland ?” and whatever else he said in his “NEW TONE” voice, he was a WHIMP!
Tonight Bush has to be tougher than Kerry, He could come out and say “Yea I screwed up on WMD’s, I also screwed a hooker last night, her dead body is in my closet right now! But I WILL PROTECT YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FROM TERROR, THIS GUY RETREATED FROM THE WAR AND EVERYTHING ELSE EXCEPT RICH WIDDOWS!!! If you want to be safe and you don’t want your children to DIE, vote for me on Election Day!"
But THAT would take longer than 5 seconds, more time than the President needs to waste on Kerry…
So how does the President win the election in 5 seconds? Simple…
He walks out on stage, and instead of shaking Kerry’s hand, he co cocks him right in the jaw, knocks him down to the ground, and walks off.
Sure people will be shocked, appalled, whatever, but there will be NO DOUBT WHO’S TOUGHER IN FIVE SECONDS TIME. That is ALL they want to know!
The problem is, we are giving the so-called “undecided voter” WAYYY to much credit. The don’t care about the issues, THEY LITERALLY DON’T KNOW THE ISSUES, they don’t understand them, that’s why they are so easily swayed by BS.
I GUARENTEE YOU the tougher looking guy will WIN this election. The undecideds want to feel SAFE.
Think of them as 9 year old kids, they don’t really understand what’s going on around them, but they want a strong parent to protect them.
The Democrats are the rebellious teenagers who THINK they know what’s going on, but also don’t REALLY have a clue. A lot of undecided are actually frightened Democrats who want protected.
Bush has to be the STRONG, PROTECTIVE ADULT tonight…
or George Forman…
Either way, he WINS!
I'd PAYYYYY to see Dubya knock the stuffing out of that overblown cheesed1ck from Boston!
Are you working on Alan Keyes' campaign???
Time to back off on your meds.
A new low.
One of the least intelligent but most wonderful posts I've read on FR.
He walks out on stage, and instead of shaking Kerry’s hand, he co cocks him right in the jaw, knocks him down to the ground, and walks off.
Sure people will be shocked, appalled, whatever, but there will be NO DOUBT WHO’S TOUGHER IN FIVE SECONDS TIME. That is ALL they want to know!
Cut out the rest of that stuff. This is the funny part. :)
Well, IMHO, this is the dumbest vanity I've seen this week.
Bush needs only to say this to put this election away: "Now is not the time to introduce a steep learning curve into the leadship of the war on terror by changing commanders in chief midstream, especially to a guy like my opponent who calls for a 'more sensitive war on terror' and called the threat of terrorism an 'exaggeration' in a January South Carolina Primary debate." That's it. It would get people to REALLY think about the stakes in this election and I think that would hurt Kerry. If Bush is going to repeat anything over and over, it should be this line, not constantly saying 'wrong war, wrong time, wrong place' which unfortunately the short-sighted electorate are agreeing more and more with.
"Tonight Bush has to be tougher than Kerry, He could come out and say “Yea I screwed up on WMD’s, I also screwed a hooker last night, her dead body is in my closet right now! But I WILL PROTECT YOU AND YOUR FAMILY FROM TERROR, THIS GUY RETREATED FROM THE WAR AND EVERYTHING ELSE EXCEPT RICH WIDDOWS!!! If you want to be safe and you don’t want your children to DIE, vote for me on Election Day!"
Ridiculous! Some of us do have moral boundaries and slinking to the lows of numerous Demoncrappers isnt' the way to go, nor is lying. Bush did NOT screw up! He made his decision on the C.I.A. information. It was the SAME information that Kerry and Edwards voted on FOR the war.
"He walks out on stage, and instead of shaking Kerry’s hand, he co cocks him right in the jaw, knocks him down to the ground, and walks off. "
This is evn dumber. It's childish. I wouldn't vote for someone who can't verbally make his case. Bush can make his case but would be doomed if he used either of these two auggestions.
LOL! Thanks. Nothing worse that a pseudo-intellectual rich widow chasing, pro-communist, sissy-boy.
I seriesly hope you're not Karl Rove.
He ought to kick his butt MATRIX-STYLE!!*!*!*!*!**! That would be so KEWL!!*!!*!!*!*!**!*!*![/twelve-year-old boy mode off] Now, back in reality...
Unfortunately I agree. He sounded like his father. That is the way his father sounds in normal conversation, but that is totally unlike what W sounds like in normal conversation.
either that or start taking them again.
I think Bush needs to lay off the ROP crap. Bombs are going off DAILY around the world. What do they have in common? ISLAM! We are at world war and he doesn't have to make it a crusade, he could just be PC and call it a worldwide Culture War.
Bush needs to hit Kerry on his Senate Record. That is the big knockout for Bush! Kerry will be hitting him on the Employment report in a huge way tonight and Bush has to hit Kerry on the fact that he missed a crucial unemployment benefits extentions vote in the Senate! HIS LOUSY SENATE RECORD IS VERY IMPORTANT! Also Kerry will be hitting Bush on the WMD report and Bush has to talk about the Oil for Food Scandal and the fact that Saddam was waiting to have the Sanctions lifted to start the weapons program again. If Bush fails to point these things out he will lose the debate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.