Posted on 10/01/2004 1:23:29 PM PDT by drangundsturm
Trading activity at Tradesports.com and IEM indicate that online traders, who bet on the outcome of political events, do not consider the purported Kerry debate "win" to be significant in the election. Both markets sold off the Bush election futures in the days before the debate to lock in very high profits from a Bush contract run-up last week, but Bush's stock has been rising all day today, even while the mainstream media continues to tout reaction polls that declare a Kerry "win".
As of this post's time, Tradesports.com has the probability of a Bush election win at 65.9%, and IEM has the probability of Bush receiving more than 50% of the two-party popular vote at 61.8%. These levels are off of Bush's recent highs but are still dramatically in his favor this far from the election.
While it may appear that there is an arbitrage available due to the spread between the two markets, that is not necessarily true because it is possible for Bush to win electorally with slightly less than 50% of the two party vote, due to favorable demographic factors. Tradesports.com does have a popular vote market and it is trading within a percent or so of the IEM equivalent.
This is interesting because it indicates that the traders believe there is about a 5% chance that Bush will win the election with fewer popular votes than Kerry.
I'd say kerry will get a modest bump in the polls that perhaps lasts a week from this performance, no more. The long term effects as his statements are turned into commercials could really hurt him, though, a far more lasting effect.
The first rasmussen tracking poll results to include significant post-debate interviews will be posted at noon tomorrow, but it will take until monday for the rolling average to fully reflect the data.
The scary thing is 20 years ago Kerry would have lost by 10-20 points. Today he could win by 1-3 points. Make me wonder where were going be in 20 years.
I am afraid we American voters will be come like Canadians. Canadian often dislike the Liberal party and usualyl loathe its leader. The Conservatives have come up with good strong leaders over the years, but still on election day no matter how corrupt the Liberals, no matter how inept, they still win. the reason they win is that the majority of Canadians believe the Liberals share their values. I am afraid we are heading to that point.
It would be scary to think that 2000 was the last election the GOP might win in decades.
Bush is just a poro debator. Jeb and GHW were much better. GHW was awful in 1992 but was great in 84 and 88.
FYI. Kerry has really dropped a lot tonight in the +157 range. I bought Kerry shares yesterday at noon for +182.50
"If he does not take John Kerry seriously then he is not taking America seriously and he deserves to lose and the whole country loses with him!"
Brillant logic! Now go vote for Nader.
market has really moved towards kerry today
So far rasmussen tracking poll indicates no significant number of votes shifting toward kerry, but kerry did help himself by appearing presidential and energizing his base, no doubt about it.
Tradesport still has bush win at just over 60%. It will take a few more days to see how it plays out.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.