Replies

"Well that is your right to have a low tolerance, I guess my tolerance is a little higher. He did not denounce all of the Swift Boats and defended them to some guests that not all of their allegations were disproven. It was easier for him to say that there are no documents to disprove sKerry's story and he wants proof by way of documents, not recollection. I see his point, disagree with it, and moved on. I don't need to watch only conservative shows to confirm my core beliefs - I use opposing viewpoints to strengthen these beliefs."

Please do not give me the liberal "tolerance" line. You surely missed his first utterances about the Swift Boats Vets and he never never ever "repented" for that.

He had a second segment with his freaking mind already made up, and slimed his way through the interview.

Now come on JFKerry went to Paris and cavorted with the enemy he caused immeasurable damage to our own and if orielly blinds himself to that he is not different or better than JFKERRY!

I absolutely agree that sKerry should be held accountable for treason and feel strongly that he single-handedly confounded the Vietnam War and urinated (thanks Rush!) on the Vets. O'Reilly is not going to go to that extreme because he's afraid to as he has to project himself as independent. I was stunned as well by his initial dismissiveness of the Swift Vets and it took me off guard. It took a long time for me to stomach his viewpoint until I realized the source - OReilly is afraid to go out on a limb on someone he's known for 25 years. I'm curious how he knows Kerry, but in the end it won't matter. I'm proud to be tolerant of opposing views and certainly would not credit any liberal of being tolerant! Tolerance is not a liberal quality - not in the least. They are so intolerant that even a genuine good person like my hero "W" can't be tolerated and they will do anything to bring him down (including fakery) to their level of tolerance. They can't handle good and honest, only lying, cheating and stealing.