Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear bomb possibly found (Unarmed Device dropped in ocean off Georgia during Cold War)
CNN ^ | 9/13/04 | CNN

Posted on 09/13/2004 7:15:02 PM PDT by gutshot

Device dropped in ocean off Georgia during Cold War WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Government experts are investigating a claim that an unarmed nuclear bomb, lost off the Georgia coast at the height of the Cold War, might have been found, an Air Force spokesman said Monday.

The hydrogen bomb was lost in the Atlantic Ocean in 1958 following a collision of a B-47 bomber and an F-86 fighter.

A group led by retired Air Force Lt. Col. Derek Duke of Statesboro, Georgia, said in July that it had found a large object underwater near Savannah that was emitting high levels of radioactivity, according to an Associated Press report.

...... Smolinsky said if the bomb were found, a decision would have to be made about whether to try to recover it or leave it where it is. .....

The 7,600-pound, 12-foot-long thermonuclear bomb contained 400 pounds of high explosives as well as uranium.

.....

The United States lost 11 nuclear bombs in accidents during the Cold War that were never recovered, according to the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank.

An estimated 50 nuclear warheads, most of them from the former Soviet Union, still lie on the bottom of the world's oceans, according to the environmental group Greenpeace. ......

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: blam; coldwar; georgia; history; newbie; nuke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-282 next last
To: Calpernia

Thanks, saw this in "breaking news" and about fainted.


41 posted on 09/13/2004 7:26:49 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

LOL! Too far south to be the Alpha!


42 posted on 09/13/2004 7:27:29 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Partisan Political Operative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

The decision to bring it home will depend on the danger it presents to health and whether it is possible that a terrorist could raise it and use it. 200 lbs of weapons grade uranium is a HUGE amout.


43 posted on 09/13/2004 7:27:50 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

Yipes, I think they should just leave it alone.


44 posted on 09/13/2004 7:28:12 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

Remember, DON'T CUT THE RED WIRE FIRST!


45 posted on 09/13/2004 7:28:14 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

That nearly scared the cr@p out of me!


46 posted on 09/13/2004 7:28:19 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

Can anybody estimate what the blast radius of that thing would be if it was detonated? I'm not THAT close, but it'd still be nice to know.


47 posted on 09/13/2004 7:28:25 PM PDT by twhitak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

One of those places is not too far from where I live.


48 posted on 09/13/2004 7:28:51 PM PDT by Constitution Day (What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gutshot
The 7,600-pound, 12-foot-long thermonuclear bomb contained 400 pounds of high explosives as well as uranium.

That is one big bomb.

49 posted on 09/13/2004 7:29:44 PM PDT by The Mayor ("A life lived for God will count for eternity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Napoleon Solo

The dollar store flags are made abroad.


50 posted on 09/13/2004 7:30:28 PM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
If that thing detonates, you can probably say goodbye to Savannah and most of the GA coast.

I know as much about nuclear bombs as brain surgery, but the article did say it was unarmed, which I would assume would mean it cannot go off.

51 posted on 09/13/2004 7:30:31 PM PDT by Popman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta

Sorry about the scary headline, but as the rules say, "Do include the original title - When you post an article, be sure to include the original title where appropriate. This helps users find the article and lessens the chance of a double post."

Maybe in this case I should have added (DUD!).


52 posted on 09/13/2004 7:31:08 PM PDT by gutshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thanks for the ping!


53 posted on 09/13/2004 7:31:23 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Uhhh.... Bush was snorting cocaine in his F-104 counting his payoffs from Haliburton, when he decided what better way to pollute the environment. Thats the ticket!!


54 posted on 09/13/2004 7:32:21 PM PDT by KingPin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

We need to bring this 1958 bomb up at night and put a document in it from Microsoft Word and date it 1998 and put Made in Iraq on that document and take it to Baghdad to "discover" as WMD, and then have Dan Rather swear to its authenticity.


55 posted on 09/13/2004 7:32:57 PM PDT by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twhitak
Can anybody estimate what the blast radius of that thing would be if it was detonated?

Since it is buried under quite a bit of water and silt that would act as an energy sink, I would guess that a 5 mile radius is probably the "safe" distance for primary blast effects even if it got full yield when it went off. As old as it is, you'll get much less than designed yield though (if any at all).

56 posted on 09/13/2004 7:33:00 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: All
Best thing to do is exactly what the Air Force says, leave it alone. The weapon cannot go to nuclear yield as it is missing the required plutonium capsule. The uranium in the bomb is a tamper but alone will not produce nuclear yield. The threat is the high explosives going off and killing whoever is messing with the thing.

The bomb itself is a Mark-15 design. Since we know it contains a uranium tamper, it must be the high yield version. In this configuration, a fully active Mark-15 would produce a yield of around 3.8 megatons.


57 posted on 09/13/2004 7:33:18 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Hannity Was Right, FReepers Tend To Eat Their Own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT; LTCJ; backhoe; AnAmericanMother
If that thing detonates, you can probably say goodbye to Savannah and most of the GA coast.

That's reassuring. NOT.

Is there any likelihood of it detonating?

58 posted on 09/13/2004 7:33:51 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BulletBobCo
Air Force officials consulted the U.S. Navy, the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Savannah District U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Something about govt consulting govt, govt consulting govt, govt consulting govt, and then govt consulting govt, that is not particularly comforting, to me at least.

59 posted on 09/13/2004 7:34:45 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: gutshot
OK, it's far enough off the coast, it would be easy to clear the area, I'll bet there's a few here that would like to see it detonated...come on fess up...it would be totally cool...

I hope PETA doesn't see this post...

5.56mm

60 posted on 09/13/2004 7:35:25 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson