Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear bomb possibly found (Unarmed Device dropped in ocean off Georgia during Cold War)
CNN ^ | 9/13/04 | CNN

Posted on 09/13/2004 7:15:02 PM PDT by gutshot

Device dropped in ocean off Georgia during Cold War WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Government experts are investigating a claim that an unarmed nuclear bomb, lost off the Georgia coast at the height of the Cold War, might have been found, an Air Force spokesman said Monday.

The hydrogen bomb was lost in the Atlantic Ocean in 1958 following a collision of a B-47 bomber and an F-86 fighter.

A group led by retired Air Force Lt. Col. Derek Duke of Statesboro, Georgia, said in July that it had found a large object underwater near Savannah that was emitting high levels of radioactivity, according to an Associated Press report.

...... Smolinsky said if the bomb were found, a decision would have to be made about whether to try to recover it or leave it where it is. .....

The 7,600-pound, 12-foot-long thermonuclear bomb contained 400 pounds of high explosives as well as uranium.

.....

The United States lost 11 nuclear bombs in accidents during the Cold War that were never recovered, according to the Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank.

An estimated 50 nuclear warheads, most of them from the former Soviet Union, still lie on the bottom of the world's oceans, according to the environmental group Greenpeace. ......

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: blam; coldwar; georgia; history; newbie; nuke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-282 next last
To: al baby

Board or not, that's one wave you'll be catching regardless.


101 posted on 09/13/2004 8:03:17 PM PDT by blackdog (Illegitumi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Peach

My first thought was "Bin Laden..."


102 posted on 09/13/2004 8:03:41 PM PDT by RockinRight (Vote early, vote often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
DEEP UNDERWATER EXPLOSION PHENOMENA

2.83 Because the effects of a deep underwater nuclear explosion are largely of military interest, the phenomena will be described in general terms and in less detail than for a shallow underwater burst. The following discussion is based largely on observations made at the WAHOO shot in 1958, when a nuclear weapon was detonated at a depth of 500 feet in deep water. The generation of large-scale water waves in deep underwater bursts will be considered in Chapter VI.

2.84 The spray dome formed by the WAHOO explosion rose to a height of 900 feet above the surface of the water (Fig. 2.84a). Shortly after the maximum height was attained, the hot gas and steam bubble burst through the dome, throwing out a plume with jets in all directions; the highest jets reached an elevation of 1,700 feet (Fig. 2.84b). There was no airborne radioactive cloud, such as was observed in the shallow underwater BAKER shot. The collapse of the plume created a visible base surge extending out to a distance of over 2½ miles downwind and reaching a maximum height of about 1,000 feet (Fig. 2.84c). This base surge traveled outward at an initial speed of nearly 75 miles per hour, but decreased within 10 seconds to less than 20 miles per hour.


. Spray dome observed 5.3 second after the explosion in deep water.


Plume observed 11.7 seconds after explosion in deep water.


Formation of base surge at 45 seconds after explosion in deep water

And there's also the shallow water Baker Shot at Bikini Atol, 90' depth.


103 posted on 09/13/2004 8:04:04 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Partisan Political Operative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

thanks for references,,


104 posted on 09/13/2004 8:05:09 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

105 posted on 09/13/2004 8:05:38 PM PDT by MattGarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

106 posted on 09/13/2004 8:06:17 PM PDT by gutshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
As all children should be of their parents......:o)

Kudos to yer Pop for going the extra mile when such was needed....

Stay safe !

107 posted on 09/13/2004 8:07:05 PM PDT by Squantos (Be polite. Be professional. But, have a plan to kill everyone you meet. ©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

unbelievable pics.


108 posted on 09/13/2004 8:07:23 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
Yea, how many feet per second, and fastest mph before impact.

I wonder how deep the water is.
as much as I hated to click on cnn.com I did.

look at this.
The bomb was dropped from an altitude of about 7,200 feet at an air speed of about 200 knots.

The Air Force investigation in 2001 estimated that the bomb landed nose first in the seabed and is now buried in 5 to 15 feet of mud.

The report also estimated it would take as long as five years and cost $5 million to $11 million to recover the bomb.


Why so long and so dam much money.
Leave it where it is.
109 posted on 09/13/2004 8:08:30 PM PDT by The Mayor ("A life lived for God will count for eternity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

He actually had a helmet of some kind and stickers for our windows and a list of things to do when the bomb hit,,we were convinced that we were a target because of the oil refinery, this was in the forties and exxon was then Standard Oil or ESSO and there were huge refineries in Baton Rouge. Later I found out everyone everywhere thought they were on the list to be bombed.


110 posted on 09/13/2004 8:09:23 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase
I always like how the media uses Crossroads-Baker and calls it a hydrogen bomb. In reality Baker was a detonation of a bomb identical to that tested at Trinity and detonated over Nagasaki.
111 posted on 09/13/2004 8:09:29 PM PDT by COEXERJ145 (Hannity Was Right, FReepers Tend To Eat Their Own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

This is teriffic! My niece and her 2 children just moved to Georgia.

Somebody tell me why they would want to leave the thing there while it's emitting radiation ..??

I'm assuming it's not armed .. but even if it's not .. what is the danger in leaving it where it is ..??


112 posted on 09/13/2004 8:09:31 PM PDT by CyberAnt (Sen.Miller said, "Bush is a God-fearing man with a good heart and a spine of tempered steel")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gutshot
I made bomb casing parts in the 80's. In all cases, the components were aluminum and were anodized. I can't say what the completed units are of for sure, but even steel parts were plasma sprayed with molten aluminum and then bolted in place with conductive gaskets.

Warm sea water and aluminum don't tolerate each other very well. The aluminum would be chalk in a decade.

113 posted on 09/13/2004 8:09:36 PM PDT by blackdog (Illegitumi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

wow


114 posted on 09/13/2004 8:09:54 PM PDT by The Mayor ("A life lived for God will count for eternity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
Why so long and so dam much money.

Government contracts?

115 posted on 09/13/2004 8:10:01 PM PDT by gutshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Squantos

I think they are more concerned of disturbing it because the TNT itself is old. when it decays, (assuming the outer shell hasn't leaked) the Nitro glycerin starts leaching out, "sweating". that stuff is very unstable in that form, and can go off with the slightest vibration.
It's not the risk of it going nuclear they are worried about, it's the risk of it exploding and scattering uranium all over the place, making a big environmental hazard zone. they would prefer to let it sit there until the casing corrodes and leaks, the water will then dilute the tnt and render it safe. Then they can remove the core safely.


116 posted on 09/13/2004 8:11:36 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: gutshot

Why so long and so dam much money.
Government contracts?


Dam Haliburton


117 posted on 09/13/2004 8:11:56 PM PDT by al baby (she stuned my little beeber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

If it were up to me I would take a little radiation in the water as opposed to a big ole boom in the atmosphere altho maybe it would be a little bomb with diry stuff emitting out. Some things ought to be left alone. Just my opinionand I spent the nite in a Holiday Inn two nites ago.


118 posted on 09/13/2004 8:12:04 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I thought I heard this thing was under like twenty feet of silt. It'd be a major salvage operation for a terrorist group to raise it. Drop some sonar bouys as a sort of burglar alarm and leave them hooked into our Atlantic Fleet. Torpedo anybody that comes snooping around....
119 posted on 09/13/2004 8:12:46 PM PDT by ExSoldier (M1A: Any mission. Any conditions. Any foe. At any range.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MattGarrett

That picture never shows the writing on the bomb. In big white letters written by hand, it says "Have a Nice Day".


120 posted on 09/13/2004 8:13:29 PM PDT by blackdog (Illegitumi non carborundum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 281-282 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson