To: liz44040; Rutles4Ever; All
It appears from the article that Debka is downplaying the significance of Khan to the AQ network and comms structure. Given that there has been a lot that Debka has gotten wrong in the past, I consider their analysis to be questionable. I would need a lot more confirmation from other sources before I get too concerned. From what DHS has put out, they've got multiple sources supporting their interpretation of the Khan data.
2,200 posted on
08/06/2004 9:48:35 AM PDT by
Godzilla
(If John Kerry is the answer, it must have been a STUPID question.)
To: Godzilla
When has Debka ever been right? They had claimed last year that Saddams troops were going into Syria to attack Israel.
To: Godzilla
It appears from the article that Debka is downplaying the significance of Khan to the AQ network and comms structure
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Agreed on all. I think the Khan deal was a settup and there is something much worst and we don't have a clue what.
Aply Tin Foil
2,331 posted on
08/06/2004 1:38:19 PM PDT by
DAVEY CROCKETT
(There is no such thing as coincidence, GOD is in control.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson