That's great. Ron Kuby goes on and on about how stringent these rules are. AP reports that the documents were "more highly guarded than even nuclear secrets". When, in fact, it's very near impossible to walk out of my local branch library with a magazine!
On other threads, several people claimed that - according to CNN - the stolen documents included one in which Richard Clarke sharply criticized the Clinton administration for its tepid approach to fighting terrorism. Has this been confirmed? If so, it would knock down the second anti-Bush media darling in two weeks, the first being Joseph Wilson. It will be the "Bush lied" people who will turn out to be the real liars.