Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GB

More DeNiro, less Pacino; always a good thing.


350 posted on 07/02/2004 11:25:09 AM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: steve8714
Yeah, Pacino has a knack for chewing the scenery, although I'm probably a voice in the wilderness among "Godfather" fans in liking No. 3 an awful lot and liking his performance in No. 3 an awful lot.

Still, again I think No. 2 was best for a variety of reasons ... Coppola's direction was incredibly strong, the acting was perfect throughout the cast ... but mostly because of the way it meshed two incredibly compelling stories, young Vito in the old days and Michael Corleone in the '50s. IMHO, some of the more compelling stuff in Puzo's book was how Vito got to be Don Corleone, and DeNiro has certainly done some worthy stuff in the 30-odd years since that movie, but I don't think he's ever topped his performance as young Vito.

No. 1 is a marvelous piece of movie-making, though.

388 posted on 07/02/2004 1:08:12 PM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson