[A Citizen Reporter]

"That last is pretty sweeping, isn't it? How can all Americans who need mental health treatment be located unless all Americans are screened? Given the President's goals, the eventual step must necessarily be universal screening, once this expansion in the purpose and mission of the federal government is undertaken."

Yes, your statement is very sweeiping, and comes to conclusions not represented by fact. But that doesn't surprise me. I still wonder why the author of this article, would choose not to sign it.

[Sabertooth]

Yes, your statement is very sweeiping, and comes to conclusions not represented by fact. But that doesn't surprise me.

You highlighted a question:

"How can all Americans who need mental health treatment be located unless all Americans are screened? Given the President's goals, the eventual step must necessarily be universal screening, once this expansion in the purpose and mission of the federal government is undertaken."

Got an answer?

I still wonder why the author of this article, would choose not to sign it.

Why? The AP frequently has articles that are unsigned. So does Reuters.

Links have been posted to the President's speech announcing the formation of this commission, and his reasons for doing so, which aren't significantly different from what's written in the article at the top of the thread. Nor is the commision's report.

"It's only WND" didn't really hunt.

[Howlin]

Because the author of this article, Jeanne Lenzer, works for the British Medical Journal and WorldNet Daily didn't bother to credit her.