Yes, why is "people of color" acceptable nowadays, but "colored people" isn't? And why has no one informed the NAACP?
There was a great Feiffer cartoon on this subject, years ago in the village voice. It's got to be almost 20 years ago that it ran, and this silly, pointless, controversy still continues.
Safe to use both:
"colored" as in NAACP
"negro" as in UNF http://www.uncf.org/
LOL! I lived in a largely black neighborhood in the 50s for a few years (age 9-13); "colored" was the word polite people used, "Negro" being too high-falutin' and the "n" word, of course, unthinkable!
Speaking of which, are they promoting white people too ? After all, white is a color. How about American Indians ?
I have been working hard to bring back the use of 'colored people.' I kind of like it, it is diverse and can cover many types of people (Hispanics, Asians, blacks, American Indians) which is helpful since I am on a campus and people worry about this stuff. I absolutely refuse to use 'African-American.' I am not about hyphenated Americans.
'People of color' is the more accepted term, but, shoot, I like 'colored people' (pronounced kullud people) and like to say it often in front of white liberals who won't attack me on my un-PC speech because I'm black.
Well, colored is too broad a term -- it can include everyone from Chinese to Arabs to Africans to South Asians to South East Asians, to even Mediterranean types