Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlotteVRWC

Thanks for all that hard work explaining the connections.
I also think Saddam had a hand in 9-11.

I resent very much people like Clarke, Kerry, Kennedy calling everyone who thinks this a moron. If Kerry gets elected, he is going to turn us over to our enemies. He wants to be friends with the people who were taking Saddam's bribes. He is for security over democracy. Aren't all communists? I remember Kerry's lies to the Congress during Vietnam. I loathe him. He sounds just like Al Jazeera. Bush freed two countries. Sure, there is terrorism; but there were terrorists running the governments in Afghanistan and Iraq before Bush. Now the killing is more visible. Even some of the Iraqi militants in Falujah are getting sick of the foreign fighters of Al Qaeda.

I have ordered Stephen Hayes' book called Connections from the link at the Weekly Standard. I've already read Mylroie and think she makes a good case.

Certainly governments are helping Al Qaeda.


5 posted on 05/30/2004 5:22:10 AM PDT by Snapple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Snapple

Less than two months before 9/11/01, the state-controlled Iraqi newspaper “Al-Nasiriya” carried a column headlined, “American, an Obsession called Osama Bin Ladin.” (July 21, 2001)

In the piece, Baath Party writer Naeem Abd Muhalhal predicted that bin Laden would attack the US “with the seriousness of the Bedouin of the desert about the way he will try to bomb the Pentagon after he destroys the White House.”

The same state-approved column also insisted that bin Laden “will strike America on the arm that is already hurting,” and that the US “will curse the memory of Frank Sinatra every time he hears his songs” – an apparent reference to the Sinatra classic, “New York, New York”.


10 posted on 05/30/2004 5:28:55 AM PDT by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Snapple
He is for security over democracy. Aren't all communists?

Indeed, however, we would never be secure if we don't continue this war on terror. My God, when will people understand in this nation of brain dead reality tv shows that if we don't fight them there, we will fight them HERE?

25 posted on 05/30/2004 9:50:04 PM PDT by ladyinred (The leftist media is the enemy within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Snapple

This bears repeating......

"If Kerry gets elected, he is going to turn us over to our enemies. He wants to be friends with the people who were taking Saddam's bribes. He is for security over democracy. Aren't all communists? I remember Kerry's lies to the Congress during Vietnam. I loathe him. He sounds just like Al Jazeera..."

Mr. Bush, now is the time to raise to the occasion and lead the United States of America into the future. You must win your second term!!!!


40 posted on 06/11/2004 7:17:06 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson