By casualties, I was speaking of deaths.
Somebody mentioned that the use of Sarin gas could result in another 9/11 and another person mentioned that what was found was enough to take out tens of thousands of people.
My statement about a relatively low number of casualties from the Japan attack, was dealing with the dead, 12, as opposed to say what could have been if the attack had been more successful.
I unnderstand that, but do you think that CNN would do a follow up on the tragedy that happened on a day in spring in 1995 on a Tokyo subway.
I doubt it. They(CNN,liberal media) wish to downplay the effects of that event.