What constitutes a WMD.
Russia agreed to the definition in use internationally and now being redefined by those with an agenda.
France and Germany both agreed to the same definition.
Matter of fact, the definition in use by the US is the definiton used the world over.
"Again- we knew he had this stuff."
From your post 399
"The hand picked man of the President- David Kay- has said that we were wrong about Sadaam and the WMDs. We have how many of Sadaam's scientists in custody? How many of his top generals and goons? Not one of them will tell us where they are? Not one of them wants a nice new life in America with a small house and white picket fence?
No. Sorry. If there were stockpiles of this stuff or advanced programs we would have found them a long time ago and loudly proclaimed so to the world."
So which is it, did he have any, or is it not there?
Did teh Sarin shells in fact exist?
According to David kay, no.
So which is it?
Don't care honestly. I am not the one who wanted to go into Iraq. I am not the one who has to prove anything. You do.
I have stated that I didn't care if Iraq had a million sarin gas shells. It would still not be a wise war or one that was justified.
Isn't it funny. We talk about Iraq's "nuke" program. Which apperently was in the toilet. Cheney - weeks before we invaded said that Iraq was very close to getting a nuke.
Sure they were. If for a second we thought that Iraq had a nuke or was close to having one we would have not invaded.
We don't invade countries that can actually hurt us. North Korea is perfect example. Says she has a nuke and what do we do? Talk. Not on the "axis of evil" any longer it seems.
Message to the world- get a nuke fast or the USA might invade you.