Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh's school of hard knocks for other guys
Palm Beach Post ^ | Sunday, May 9, 2004 | Frank Cerabino

Posted on 05/08/2004 9:01:04 PM PDT by new cruelty

Rush Limbaugh is a slow learner.

That might explain why he looked at the sadistic photos from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and likened them to some college fraternity high jinks.

Boolah, mullah! Boolah, mullah!

Most reasonable people expressed disgust by the sight of the bound, nude, hooded men in American custody being forced to degrade themselves sexually.

And Limbaugh surely would have, too, if it had been under the previous administration.

But Limbaugh's a referee without a whistle these days. So here's how he excused the inexcusable:

"This is no different than what happens at the Skull and Bones initiation, and we're going to ruin people's lives over it, and we're going to hamper our military effort, and then we are going to really hammer them because they had a good time," he said on his radio show.

Limbaugh added: "I'm talking about people having a good time. These people, you ever heard of emotional release? You heard of need to blow some steam off?"

I knew he was an apologist. But I just figured that in light of his newfound expertise in the realm of investigatory zeal run amok -- something he claims to have learned the hard way in Palm Beach County -- he might have temporarily burst through the wall of his professional limitations.

But, like I said, Limbaugh is apparently a slow learner.

And yet, there's hope.

There used to be a time when he thought that the problem with drugs was that we weren't locking up the people who got caught. This was during the days when he thought the American Civil Liberties Union was a flaky impediment to justice and criminal defense lawyers were an evil bunch of liberal simps who were out to subvert the truth by freeing the guilty on procedural maneuvers.

He has been educated through experience in that regard.

Caught in cross hairs of justice

Ever since the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office declined to respectfully turn a blind eye to Limbaugh's years of prescription drug abuse, he has become a champion of the drug addict caught in the cross hairs of justice. He talks of the pain of addiction, the need for treatment and the unfairness of prosecutors pursuing people with a personal problem.

If you go to Limbaugh's Web site these days, it's full of tales of horrific miscarriages of justice and calls to end investigatory techniques that we, as Americans, shouldn't stand for.

There are warnings about the "threat to the rule of law." Harassment we can't condone. And a horrible "fishing expedition" for information that should chill us to the core.

No, none of that is about the sadistic abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison.

It's all about Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer's having the nerve to document Limbaugh's drug abuse through the use of his medical records.

Oh, the horror!

From Limbaugh's bellowing, you'd think Krischer was breaking chemical lights and pouring the scorching phosphoric liquid over the naked talk-show host's... oh, never mind.

Besides, that's just "people having a good time."

All those naked Iraqis must be guilty of something, right? There can't be any innocent civilians rounded up by overzealous authorities. That never happens.

And as for the guilty -- well, the rights of people behind bars is just a left-wing abstraction.

For now. The slow learner better hope this isn't the next awakening in his education.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321 next last
To: Anti-Bush Hater
Prankish and not really that inflammatory.

Bull. Most emphatically disagreed with that, including those on this non-representative site. They were disgusting, unprofessional, illegal, ineffectual, and damaging to both the moral standing of this country, and to the causes for which it fights. Granted the unpublished ones, probably represent even more serious felonies, with even more attendant damage. And you know what? It appears the brass looked the other way. Kay mentioned it, others mentioned it, but nobody cared, because they thought it was generating information, however illegally obtained. The brass is in big trouble. Stay tuned.

21 posted on 05/08/2004 9:17:05 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Thanks. Shallow swallower, or something.
22 posted on 05/08/2004 9:17:59 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Voice in your head
. Now, the Arab world can hold up a picture for their illiterate masses of puppets to look at in horror and outrage.

Now why would the Arab world be showing these pictures to democrat voters?

23 posted on 05/08/2004 9:18:47 PM PDT by Morgan's Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Torie
"Rush is a very bright, articulate, informed, but swallow man, of limited wisdom, who panders to his audience for ratings. The man has no depth. He bores the hell out of me."

I disagree with your assessment of Rush, but hey -- if Bill Buckley's your cup of tea...(snore...)

25 posted on 05/08/2004 9:20:01 PM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: holdonnow
Perhaps the 21 million just have a naughty little habit. I will leave the IQ thingie to others to parse.
26 posted on 05/08/2004 9:20:30 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dmcloud
Riiight. Thank you for playing.
27 posted on 05/08/2004 9:20:59 PM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
Is Bill Buckley still alive? He has been an animated cadaver for about 20 years now. But he does have a good vocabulary, and back when, did introduce me to some ideas.
28 posted on 05/08/2004 9:22:19 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
We're going to lose this war. Rush fired a shot in our direction. We should get our troops out now.
29 posted on 05/08/2004 9:23:11 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Rush is no intellectual ? I don't think you ever listen to him he has an incredible knack for seeing through BS and than putting it in simple terms that even idiots can understand. I doubt you could stay in he same room with him.
30 posted on 05/08/2004 9:24:16 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Texas Eagle wrote: (....but he's no intellectual, that's for sure.) Thank God. I believe it was William F. Buckley who said: "I'd rather be governed by the first 500 names in the Boston phone book than by the entire staff and faculty of Harvard."

The problem, Rush tries to con people into believing he's more knowledgable than he really is.

Two examples from within the last two weeks:

Rush made a big thing about trying to discredit somebody because they wrote that Iraqis were Arabs.

Rush said that Iraqis weren't Arabs.

Rush is dead-wrong, the majority of Iraqis are Arabs.

Rush went into a riff about how he was amazed that anyone would be dumb enough to characterize the words 'infer' and 'imply' as being synonymous.

He said that even dictionaries made this mistake.

But Rush neglected to mention that he lifted this directly from the opening scene of Rex Stout's Nero Wolfe novel "Gambit".

Sometimes Rush shovels bullbleep to his audience.

31 posted on 05/08/2004 9:24:26 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
Boolah, mullah! Boolah, mullah!

completely off the subject, but that seems like a great tag line ...
32 posted on 05/08/2004 9:25:35 PM PDT by Bobby777 (Boolah, mullah! Boolah, mullah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Then your recollection sucks.

I posted to you because the very last time I noticed your name, it was being used in reference to a derogatory comment about Limbaugh.

33 posted on 05/08/2004 9:26:00 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Torie
I don't remember Rush approving of such behavior. I think his take was that the pictures were taken out of context. Personally, I don't have a problem with what they did.
34 posted on 05/08/2004 9:26:22 PM PDT by Ajnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jla
Well, I certainly wouldn't call Rush a bird man....
35 posted on 05/08/2004 9:26:53 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Oh, YOU must be very special then...congratulations!
36 posted on 05/08/2004 9:27:20 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Yea ...and that guy Mark Twain was a lightweight too ...Its the folksy stuff ...Ya cant be folksy and be real intellectual ...heck Will Rogers was dumb and boring too...And then that Faulkner guy a real yokel....always talkin about dumb southeners while he was drunk


(scarcasm for the scarcastically challenged)
37 posted on 05/08/2004 9:27:38 PM PDT by woofie ( 99% of lawyers give the rest a bad name.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
How long ago did you notice me. :)
38 posted on 05/08/2004 9:27:56 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Ok how does one be bright, articulate, informed yet limited? If he bores you please don't listen to his bright, articulate and well informed opinions.
39 posted on 05/08/2004 9:28:40 PM PDT by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: new cruelty
"Most reasonable people expressed disgust by the sight of the bound, nude, hooded men in American custody being forced to degrade themselves sexually."

Sadly, some here on FR had much the same reaction as Rush. One depraved soul here on this site actually claimed that those who were debasing Iraqui prisoners were "protecting American lives." I asked him to explain how mistreating prisoners in our charge protected Americans. Predictably, no explanation has been given.

People who think that this is "no big deal" are sick, sick, sick.
40 posted on 05/08/2004 9:30:11 PM PDT by Henrietta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson