[ninenot]

My mind's still very open on this one...

But as the deputy said in Fr. Kunz's case: 'NOBODY ever 'expects' the perp to have done the deed.'

It's not impossible for someone to keep that sort of secret for that long, nor is it impossible that he did it.

The question to me is not "Satanism," but motive in general.

[heyheyhey]

Of course, the motive would indicate a potential killer. Robbery, as a motive, was excluded early on. Also, the peculiar way her body was treated - candles, altar cloth, exclude simple robbery.

A satanic, ritualistic killing? I think it was only made by the killer or killers to look that way. It was also made to look as if there was a sexual assault involved.

Sister Pahl was well known, she "was a former director of the hospital's nursing school and also was an administrator at hospitals in Toledo and Tiffin." So, she could have had enemies.

There is NO WAY to reopen the case after 24 years based on a testimony of a gal fed human eyeball by a group of Catholic priests. It's BS justice. Thank to our US Catholic Bishops' historical meeting in Dallas.