Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: biblewonk
Ofcourse. Can't you see why?

Yes. While wine and beer were still available, the bit of a high you could get off those wasn't worth the danger of getting caught. Distilled spirits were much more effective for the same amount of danger. Plus, from a production standpoint, producers could ship more money's worth of alcohol high in the same shipment, meaning a successful shipment of liquor gave more profit than one of beer or wine.

None but the most tyrannical of laws can argue with basic economics and human nature.

470 posted on 04/07/2004 1:57:58 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
A couple of more points, it was depression time which meant there was less money to spend. And it was illegal which meant you had to be willing to pay a premium for the risk. My grandma was a "flapper" though and they drank freely at speak-easy's. All the cops knew they were there and there were even city officials involved. If there was ever a bust it was for political expedience. IOW it was as "illegal" as prostitution is today. IE not really illegal at all.
474 posted on 04/07/2004 2:04:48 PM PDT by biblewonk (The only book worth reading, and reading, and reading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson