To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It is a big dirty snow ball. It should not be considered a terrestrial body i.e. "planet".
2 posted on
03/14/2004 11:49:23 AM PST by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
Sedna, I'm glad I medya.
To: Destro
Well
planet: any of the large bodies that revolve around the sun in the solar system
Looks like we need a defenite defenition of "large".
15 posted on
03/14/2004 12:03:50 PM PST by
Bogey78O
(The Democrats promised jobs but all they gave you was gay marriage- AppyPappy)
To: Destro
It is about 1/6th the diameter of the earth.
That isn't exactly "small".
16 posted on
03/14/2004 12:04:06 PM PST by
DB
(©)
To: Destro
I think a planet would be a celstial body that orbits a star and has it's own rotation as well as a regular revolution. no indication if this body rotates around an axis.
41 posted on
03/14/2004 12:38:43 PM PST by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
To: Destro
Crash it into Mars. That would increase the mass of mars allowing Mars to retain more atmosphere. It would also provide more water.
72 posted on
03/14/2004 5:12:17 PM PST by
DannyTN
To: Destro
It should not be considered a terrestrial body i.e. "planet" Even Pluto is marginal. But these Kuiper objects will be very valuable some day whether we call them planets or planetoids or planetless moons. Sure is cold out there. Dark, too.
116 posted on
03/15/2004 11:15:46 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson