Skip to comments.
Rosie's Story (20/20 background; Dads are Missing)
ABC News ^
| March 14, 2002
| Rebecca Raphael
Posted on 03/13/2004 6:02:23 AM PST by gobucks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Rosie, and her now 'spouse', Kelli Carpenter O'Donnell , we're on T.V. last night. The 20/20 story last night, and this story from two years ago show something pretty revealing.
Did ABC, the we-love-everything-gay-network, bother to discuss a possible cause behind why these two women are making utter fools of themselves (not to mention what they are doing to 4 kids who don't have a clue ... yet).
Here it is in black and white: Rosie didn't have a father ... he was "not very available," as she put it.
Kelly's parents are all over the story last night, and ostensibly trying to make a good go of it .... but what happens?
We learn that Kelly's 'father' is actually the 'step-father'. Not one word about Kelly's natural father. Why? Ah, b/c that part of the story doesn't fit the agenda.
Two women, gay. Now 'married'. Pushing the gay marriage agenda.
Where is the real Dad for both of these women? He's missing. Where is real Dad for the 4 kids? He's missing.
To the Men out there that are Dads ... do you see what I see? If we fail as fathers, if we run, hide, drug ourselves, whatever ... then our kids grow into adults. But not the adults they should be. Sometimes, they grow into something that is very understandable ... given our neglect.
So ... I just wish Rosie and Kelly would tell the truth: given that their Dads weren't fathering, it should be Ok for them to get married. Anything Gay should go, b/c after all, the Father set the example long ago. He went.
Given the USA has essentially made fathering something that can easily get you jailed, well, then, logically, gay marriage just follows as a consequence.
Let's call gay marriage for what it is .... the harvest of weak fathers.
1
posted on
03/13/2004 6:02:24 AM PST
by
gobucks
To: gobucks
notice how donuts did not say "mother", she only said she was a "gay parent".
They can't accept any gender definitions because it identifies rolls and rules. (who has what genitals)
Donuts is being used for her money.
To: gobucks
Maybe this is a loud call for fathers to be active in their daughter's lives - I am.
To: gobucks
4
posted on
03/13/2004 6:10:32 AM PST
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
To: gobucks
Rosy's a pig.
5
posted on
03/13/2004 6:12:53 AM PST
by
petercooper
(Florida 2000: Bush 2,912,790 - Gore 2,912,253)
To: gobucks
I don't think Kelly is too crazy about the kids. Seems she's in it for Rosie's money. Poor kids.
6
posted on
03/13/2004 6:15:59 AM PST
by
Lijahsbubbe
(Also goes partly violently)
To: petercooper
Rosy's a pig.She smells too.....
7
posted on
03/13/2004 6:16:23 AM PST
by
b4its2late
(Place your clothes and weapons where you can find them in the dark!)
To: longtermmemmory
I think that Rosie thinks she is a daddy. She thinks her girlfriend is her "wife". Rosie is more than just "a little" nuts.
8
posted on
03/13/2004 6:16:58 AM PST
by
tessalu
To: gobucks
I never figured out the libs on this stuff.
If a kid is raised incorrectly and therefore messed up in childhood - Then, as an adult - all bad behavior is OK?
What's wrong with the State stepping in with adult punishment?
This nation has about 15-30% far lefties and some are raising children !!!
9
posted on
03/13/2004 6:20:36 AM PST
by
The Raven
To: petercooper
Rosy's a pig. Attention Whore also fits. So Rosie is a Piggish Attention Whore, or a Whorish Attention Pig.
To: tessalu
homosexual parenting is child abuse? seems like it.
To: gobucks
"...ABC, the we-love-everything-gay-network..."I wonder if this philosophy might have something to do with ABC's continuing audience loss? The headline of the following article blames it on "Kingdom Hospital" but note that the losses are across the board:
ABC Profit Questioned as 'Hospital' Ratings Dip
|
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Broadcaster ABC, battered by questions about how it would reverse a long-term ratings slump, took two more hits this week, as a financial analyst questioned its ability to meet its profit goals and its most important new show fell sharply in the ratings.
In a research note Thursday, CIBC World Markets analyst Michael Gallant estimated that ABC's ratings in the second half of the season were running about 15 percent below its guarantees to advertisers, putting the network on track to fall 9 percent short for the full season.
Those shortfalls, he said, would translate into $110 million in "makegoods," or free air time given to advertisers to compensate for ratings shortfalls.
That would mean an impact, Gallant said, of 3 cents per share on the bottom line of ABC parent the Walt Disney Co. in the March and June quarters.
He also said he expected ABC to end up $200 million to $250 million short of a goal to be breakeven.
Disney Chief Operating Officer Bob Iger, whose responsibilities include ABC, said this week that prime time has been "a real mess" since the collapse of "Who Wants to be a Millionaire" in 2000. But he said the network was still on track to crack a profit in fiscal 2005, thanks in part to cost cuts and new slates of successful comedies.
"They have made progress. Their investment in comedies is a good example of that," Iger said at an investment conference. "They have also fixed their cost structure and so that the prediction the network is going to be profitable in '05 is I think quite realistic."
Gallant's forecast came as the network saw a sharp drop in second-week ratings for "Stephen King's Kingdom Hospital," the Wednesday night drama ABC executives have touted as key to their strategy for this part of the season.
Settling into its regular 10 p.m. time slot after a two-hour series premiere the week prior, the show finished second in the hour among the key audience of adults ages 18 to 49, behind a repeat of "Law & Order" on NBC.
Its rating in that audience, prized by advertisers, fell by nearly 33 percent week over week, as total viewership fell sharply as well.
However, ABC said the show was best in its hour among adults ages 18 to 34 and was an improvement in most key categories over the programs it had shown in that slot this season. (Additional reporting by Peter Henderson)
Source
I don't know how many other families do what ours does when someone tries to shove their gay agenda into our faces--we switch channels, or turn off the teevee--but if there are others like us, expect viewership to continue its downward spiral. Barbara Walters can gush over the gayness of Rosie all she wants, but not on our television.
12
posted on
03/13/2004 6:30:30 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
To: The Raven
If a kid is raised incorrectly and therefore messed up in childhood - Then, as an adult - all bad behavior is OK? Yes. And that means that their bad behavior toward their kids is OK and when their kids grow up then their bad behavior toward their kids is OK because they were raised incorrectly. And then when their kids grow up then their bad behavior toward their kids is OK because they were raised incorrectly. And then when their kids grow up then their bad behavior toward their kids is OK because they were raised incorrectly.....ow!
Aspirin, I need aspirin.
13
posted on
03/13/2004 6:30:36 AM PST
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Proudly out of step with the majority since 1973)
To: gobucks
Let's call gay marriage for what it is .... the harvest of weak fathers. Let's call female homosexual marriage what it is. . . the harvest of weak fathers. Then, we have to call male homosexual marriage what it is. . . the harvest of weak mothers.
14
posted on
03/13/2004 6:31:33 AM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: William Terrell
Let's just call both types what they are: weak morals.
15
posted on
03/13/2004 6:37:08 AM PST
by
MizSterious
(First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: gobucks
Notice whenever these single/gay adoptive parents talk about adoption, it's always about THEIR needs and fulfillment, THEIR identity, etc. The needs or benefit to the children is never a concern. Children have become possessions that can be collected or discarded as the moment dictates. It happens in dumpsters, high school restrooms and so-called 'clinics'. It's all part of the societal devaluation of human life, yet these same monsters will condemn the death penalty. Death and abuse is apparently only for the innocent.
17
posted on
03/13/2004 6:48:28 AM PST
by
Spok
To: William Terrell
Then, we have to call male homosexual marriage what it is. . . the harvest of weak mothers.
Actually, I used the neutral 'gay marriage' on purpose. For women or men who happen to fall into the gay lifestyle, it's weak fathers that are the culprit in both cases.
I've met more than a few gay people, and I've done a LOT of reading. For a good long time, I thought the 'strong' mother was indeed a primary root cause of gay men.
Not anymore. The mothers only got 'strong' b/c the weak father created a vacuum.
A catholic priest, a specialist in SSAD (same sex attachment disorder) has put it rather succiently:
"If you are a father of a young son, and you fail to hug him adequately (physically, spiritually, emotionally), then you can bet when he grows older, he will seek and find a man who will".
Bottom line, homosexuality is mostly a very bad bonding disorder created by the neglect, sometimes abuse, but primarily neglect, of the natural father. And last night, that was just fine by ABC as any mention of natural fathers of any of these individuals in this 'gay' family was deliberately suppressed.
By the way, all the comments about Rosie I've seen so far .... there's one I haven't seen. I'll offer it: I have yet to see a single photo where she DOESN'T have a fake smile.
She spreads her mouth, bares her teeth, and her eyes appear totally empty. I feel some pity for her ... but would feel more if she wasn't so politically active against Bush.
(FWIW, I have two teen daughters, and each enjoys a one night a week father/daughter date - I had no idea how important these would be , but after the last few months, I'm a bit clued in)
18
posted on
03/13/2004 6:51:44 AM PST
by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
To: Spok
We're in agreement about how totally anti-kid our society has become.
The results will be rolling in more and more in the coming years.
19
posted on
03/13/2004 6:52:50 AM PST
by
gobucks
(http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
To: petercooper
Do you suppose the snake in the garden with adam and eve was really named Rosy?
20
posted on
03/13/2004 6:58:18 AM PST
by
gakrak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson