Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pilot in Hot Water for Allegedly Using Plane as Flying Pulpit
Talon News / GOP USA ^ | Feb. 10, 2004 | Jeremy Reynalds

Posted on 02/10/2004 8:41:16 AM PST by prairiebreeze

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-257 next last
To: jim35
Matthew 6:6

But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
81 posted on 02/10/2004 10:19:57 AM PST by libravoter (Live from the People's Republic of Cambridge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
And, of course, all the nitwits supporting this moron pilot are PERFECTLY free to scrape together their $45.17 or whatever they have saved up between them and start a Christian Airline, and advertise that their pilots will evangelize continuously during their flight.
82 posted on 02/10/2004 10:20:01 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: jim35
So you think calling non-Christians "crazy" is an effective means of converting them to Christianity?

83 posted on 02/10/2004 10:21:10 AM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: John H K; All
I guess I need to do more extensive searches with keywords.
Sorry for the duplication.

Prairie
84 posted on 02/10/2004 10:21:47 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Absolutely! And if they encourage their pilots to fly armed, I'd gladly be one of their customers.
85 posted on 02/10/2004 10:23:05 AM PST by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: John H K
>>So you think calling non-Christians "crazy" is an effective means of converting them to Christianity?


About as effective as calling those who disagree with some of the Administrations's policies, well you know the labels and names.

Took me a long time to come up with an effective retort to "have you been saved?" - Not from you.
86 posted on 02/10/2004 10:24:15 AM PST by swarthyguy (Russia doesn't conduct negotiations with terrorists -- it destroys them," Vlad Putin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada
"...to refrain from discussing religion during flight does not violate the First Amendment because there is no "state action..."

True. But it doesn't make it any easier to swallow. So, submit your list to the airline, and hope for the best. Maybe we can make pilots a special group which is limited to discussing the weather. I will then send them my list, on topics which I insist that they DO discuss, with Christianity at the top. Somehow, I'm betting I'd lose.
87 posted on 02/10/2004 10:24:51 AM PST by jim35 (A third party vote is a vote for the DemocRATs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: jackibutterfly
This "keeping God" out of our public life IS insane

A privately owned airline is not "public".

Let me demonstrate: If you are naked on the street, you are cited for public nudity. If an airline has a naked flight, you are not. Why? When on a privately owned airline, you are not in public.

88 posted on 02/10/2004 10:28:14 AM PST by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Well, THAT would never work, as I am a devout Catholic. YOU don't believe we ALL should acknowledge GOD? I guess you also don't believe in Him, no? Why would you be uncomfortable with bringing God into conversations with others? Why do we have to stifle that? It sure is curious. I'm surprised that the 1st thing you thought of when I suggested that talking about God should be natural is the Taliban - as if they are the only ones who acknowledge God. Of course, the god they acknowledge is, from what I understand, the moon god, NOT our Creator.
89 posted on 02/10/2004 10:29:18 AM PST by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: libravoter
"Matthew 6:6"

Spare me the self-serving Bible quotes. Just try and tell me with a straight face that the Bible says we should not try to spread the message of Christianity. I dare you.
90 posted on 02/10/2004 10:33:45 AM PST by jim35 (A third party vote is a vote for the DemocRATs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
Whoops, I guess I missed that - I just assumed it was on a regular flight. But, still, why do we have to cringe when God, or Jesus, is mentioned? As I told EggsAckley, mentioning and discussing God should be as natural as breathing. I believe our spirit is as much a part of us as our mind or body, that we were created that way.
91 posted on 02/10/2004 10:34:48 AM PST by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jim35
Which time would that be? In church, or in the confines of your home, exclusively? Or are there any public venues in which you would be willing to tolerate religious speech?

In church is fine, and it's also fine in one's home. However, given the context in which this happened (captive audience on an airplane 1 1/2 years after 9/11), I don't think this was the time or place. But for some odd reason, I don't think that you are open-minded enough to see this point.

92 posted on 02/10/2004 10:36:14 AM PST by Born Conservative ("Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names" - John F. Kennedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
"...If you are naked on the street, you are cited for public nudity..."

You can be sited for public nudity if you're naked on your front lawn. This is still "the public." Get with the program.
93 posted on 02/10/2004 10:36:21 AM PST by jim35 (A third party vote is a vote for the DemocRATs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: jim35
You can be sited for public nudity if you're naked on your front lawn.

Not if it's unviewable from the street.

94 posted on 02/10/2004 10:38:18 AM PST by freeeee ("Owning" property in the US just means you have one less landlord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: All
And, darn, I have to leave. Can't continue this fascinating discussion. Chat with you all later?
95 posted on 02/10/2004 10:38:43 AM PST by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: zx2dragon
Any christian who did not raise their hand on that flight should be ashamed.

Luke 9:23-26
23Then he (Jesus) said to them all: "If anyone would come after me, he must deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow me. 24For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for me will save it. 25What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, and yet lose or forfeit his very self? 26If anyone is ashamed of me and my words, the Son of Man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his glory and in the glory of the Father and of the holy angels.
96 posted on 02/10/2004 10:38:49 AM PST by California74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
"Not one single person raised their hand on the flight"

The pilot didn't force anyone. It was their own choice on whether to proclaim their faith.

As far as it being "scary,goofy,insulting,personal and possibly dangerous", hearing a man that had just come back from a missions trip all excited about spreading the word would be a really nice surprise compared to all the negative there is in the world today.AMEN(when praising the Lord, it's always correctly placed!)
97 posted on 02/10/2004 10:40:11 AM PST by codyjacksmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
"...But for some odd reason, I don't think that you are open-minded enough to see this point..."

Yeah, it must be a very odd reason indeed. So, because I'm FOR freedom of religious expression, in nearly every form, I'm the one who's NOT open-minded. Interesting conclusion. You are right in your conclusion, of course. I'm not very open-minded at all, and am in fact often judgemental. But this isn't because I believe in freedom of religious expression. It's because I believe in certain moral and ethical boundaries, and find fault when they are broken.
98 posted on 02/10/2004 10:41:37 AM PST by jim35 (A third party vote is a vote for the DemocRATs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: codyjacksmom
...hearing a man that had just come back from a missions trip all excited about spreading the word would be a really nice surprise

And if he had just returned from his hadj to Mecca?

99 posted on 02/10/2004 10:42:39 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: jim35
Would you be defending him so much if he had asked for the Jews or Islamics to share their views or are you in his corner because he was Christian? I don't want a pilot, teacher, waitress or neighbor to trap me into a converstion meant to defend my religious believes or try to sway someone else in theirs. As someone said in another thread and mothers have been saying for years - religion and politics are not topics to discuss in polite company.
100 posted on 02/10/2004 10:43:04 AM PST by fml ( You can twist perception, reality won't budge. -RUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 241-257 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson