Skip to comments.
Inmate Deemed Retarded Still on Death Row
AP ^
| 12-29-03
| CHRIS KAHN
Posted on 12/29/2003 2:12:53 PM PST by Indy Pendance
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Indy Pendance
While noting that 1 percent to 3 percent of the population could be considered retarded If anyone ever wondered where the bulk of Hillary's support comes from...
2
posted on
12/29/2003 2:14:14 PM PST
by
TheBigB
(...international law is whatever the United States and Great Britain say it is. - Ann Coulter)
To: TheBigB
1 percent to 3 percent of the population could be considered retardedI don't know. I find that number to be far too low.
3
posted on
12/29/2003 2:19:20 PM PST
by
EggsAckley
(......................... IT'S NOT MY FAULT ! ! ! ...................................)
To: Indy Pendance
An IQ of 59 would classify him as mildly retarded and doesn't mean he cannot comprehend the difference between right and wrong.
4
posted on
12/29/2003 2:20:19 PM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Indy Pendance
And while several states say an IQ of 70 or below constitutes retardation, Arkansas says an IQ of 65 is strong evidence of retardation.
Ah, Arkansas, you do yourself proud yet again...
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
5
posted on
12/29/2003 2:22:35 PM PST
by
End Times Sentinel
("Fire can be our servant, whether it's toasting S'mores or raining down on Charlie" –Ppl Skinner)
To: Indy Pendance
"Inmate Deemed Retarded Still on Death Row" Meanwhile, the Airman he murdered is still dead. It is not known if he plans to appeal.
To: TheBigB
Atkins, 26, was sentenced to death for shooting a Langley Air Force Base enlisted man for beer money in 1996.
This statement is the only relevant issue at hand. The death penalty is used, in part, to keep the offenders from racking up more victims (including other inmates). If someone is so retarded that they are unable to refrain from killing others, then they are too great of a threat to society to remain in society. The same goes for those deemed "insane". I say that if you're so insane that you can't refrain from killing others, that you should also be removed from society. We've focused for far too long on the "why" of crimes like the one committed by this guy. Who cares why? If you murder someone you're dangerous and deserve your just punishment. Does the fact that the killer is insane, retarded, an abused child, or whatever else take away from the fact that the victim is still permanently dead?
7
posted on
12/29/2003 2:23:56 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(Get real, Control-Everybody-But-Yourselves freaks!)
To: Indy Pendance
If they can manage to wander around and stay fed and clothed, they are competent enough to be held responsible for their acts.
SO9
8
posted on
12/29/2003 2:24:49 PM PST
by
Servant of the 9
(Real Texicans; we're grizzled, we're grumpy and we're armed)
To: Blood of Tyrants
At the risk of sounding cruel, so what if he is retarded, mildly or otherwise? So what?
He committed heinous crimes and should be executed. Once dead, he will commit no more murders - perfect prevention.
9
posted on
12/29/2003 2:25:29 PM PST
by
Ophiucus
To: Indy Pendance
While noting that 1 percent to 3 percent of the population could be considered retarded, the high court left it to states to determine which of the 3,504 death row inmates in America fall into that category. Since the Constitution is quite clear about the issues the Federal Government is authorized to address, this is a refreshing change from the usual way things work out. It should be state or local determination.
10
posted on
12/29/2003 2:29:09 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Jaysun
Comedian Bobby Slayton had the best take on this..."And we've got all these guilty liberals saying we can't execute retarded people. 'That's crazy! They don't know what they did,' they're sayin'. Well, if they don't know what they did, then they don't know we're gonna execute 'em, do they? Strap in the electric chair and tell 'em it's an effing ride..."
11
posted on
12/29/2003 2:30:29 PM PST
by
TheBigB
(...international law is whatever the United States and Great Britain say it is. - Ann Coulter)
To: Indy Pendance
Fry the SOB.
His continued existence is a profound insult to the millions of mentally challeged citizens who never harm anyone.
12
posted on
12/29/2003 2:31:16 PM PST
by
Publius6961
(40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: Ophiucus
You don't sound cruel to me, you sound perfectly reasonable.
I heard a comedian the other night talk about some states trying to abolish the death penalty. He said his state & mine (Texas) was putting in an express lane.
13
posted on
12/29/2003 2:35:52 PM PST
by
Ditter
To: Jaysun
If you murder someone you're dangerous and deserve your just punishment. Bingo !
14
posted on
12/29/2003 2:38:18 PM PST
by
jimt
To: Indy Pendance
If he's so retarded, then he won't know they're executing him. Where's the problem?
--Boot Hill
15
posted on
12/29/2003 2:38:40 PM PST
by
Boot Hill
(Entropy Kills!!!)
To: Ditter
lol - that's a good one.
Some outhouses used to be "two-holers," maybe something similar could be rigged for the chair. Call it an enviro-friendly, energy conservation move.
16
posted on
12/29/2003 2:46:55 PM PST
by
Ophiucus
To: TheBigB
if they don't know what they did, then they don't know we're gonna execute 'em, do they
Finally! Need anyone say more.
To: Indy Pendance
I cannot imagine anyone who needs execution more than a retarded killer. No chance to rehab, no real understaning of what is going on, just walking danger.
18
posted on
12/29/2003 3:15:45 PM PST
by
mlmr
(Drivel, tedious, trivial drivel, I tell you...)
To: Ophiucus
At the risk of sounding cruel, so what if he is retarded, mildly or otherwise? So what? I fully agree.
This guy has a genius E.Q.--Evil Quotient.
To: Indy Pendance
When will murderers be treated as murderers?
In this case the so-called "retarded" inmate is a MURDERER. Does a person's intellectual level proove that they are not a danger to society?
Of course, I feel the same way about "kids" who are not charged as adults when they commit very adult crimes such as murder.
20
posted on
12/29/2003 3:28:06 PM PST
by
TheBattman
(Do it your way - just don't come crying to me when it doesn't work!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson