[NutCrackerBoy]

We need to be much more pro-active on eliminating threats before they're imminent...Following 9/11, we await certainty at our peril. -Senator Evan Bayh D-Indiana

[Mo1]

"Even if there's only a 10 percent chance that Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden would cooperate, the question is whether that's an acceptable level of risk," Bayh told me.

What is an acceptable level of risk to them??

[zarf]

Bayh is a good man. He represents the "loyal" opposition.
I would trust him to defend American interests and he woud give Bush a run for his money.

Fortunately for us, the Demonrats are too stupid to recognize it.

[Outraged]

Senator John Kerry, in a speech last week to the Council on Foreign Relations, said that "the Bush administration has pursued the most arrogant, inept, reckless, and ideological foreign policy in modern history. . . . The global war on terrorism has actually been set back."

John Kerry should be hung for treason...He and Howard Dean are a couple of punks who I wouldn't mind knocking out.

[Outraged]

Says Chambliss: "The Democratic memo took a shot at the chairman [Senator Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican] and took a shot at undermining the intelligence on Iraq. . . . The memo to me did not sound like Jay [Rockefeller]. I've always suspected that the Democratic leadership put lots of pressure on him to politicize this process."

No Chambliss, if you had any balls and a modicum of integrity you should have said: "The Democrat memo created a strategem of falsifying and misappropriating intel for the soul purpose of destroying the President and undermining the war on terror, for political gain. . . I would be lying if I said the memo did not sound like Jay [Rockefeller], given all signs seem to point him. . .What is without question is that Jay [Rockefeller] at the very least was complicit in the memo as it came from his office."

In short, Chambliss is a lying weasel covering for a lying weasel.