Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Help me out, here!
1 posted on 12/01/2003 9:01:42 AM PST by basil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: basil
cert denied, Silveira
2 posted on 12/01/2003 9:04:16 AM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
black robed bastards
3 posted on 12/01/2003 9:06:39 AM PST by Centurion2000 (Resolve to perform what you ought, perform without fail what you resolve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Do a self search. You've been ping'ed to two different threads.
4 posted on 12/01/2003 9:07:00 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
So, the Supremes ducked another 2nd Amendment case. I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!
5 posted on 12/01/2003 9:07:28 AM PST by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
...Help me out, here!...

It's simple, the SCOTUS is made up of a bunch of weasely skunklicking puke bastards who should be rounded up and deported to Zimbabwe or worse.


8 posted on 12/01/2003 9:13:03 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Keep and Bear Arms website
10 posted on 12/01/2003 9:23:14 AM PST by Gunner9mm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Tell them this:

"In short, the Silveira attorney led with his (and our) chins. He brought a foolish case, and persisted even when it was clear that he had no reasonable chance of success on appeal. His failure to file a reply brief was terrible. The fruit of his labor is a horrendous Ninth Circuit opinion which will harm the Second Amendment for years to come." -- David Kopel

11 posted on 12/01/2003 9:29:18 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Looks like this is still current!


15 posted on 12/01/2003 9:51:35 AM PST by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
It's a good thing cert was denied. The plaintiffs in the case were criminals, and the 2nd Amendment issue was not cleanly presented.

There are other cases coming up in the federal courts with better, law-abiding plaintiffs and with the issue of 2nd Amendment more crisply presented - see the Parker case in the DC Federal Court:

http://www.cato.org/new/02-03/02-10-03r.html

16 posted on 12/01/2003 10:00:12 AM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
The supreme court knows that the 2nd Amendment says that the people have the right to own firearms. However actually ruling so would go against their political agenda, so they refuse to hear the case.
26 posted on 12/01/2003 10:22:34 AM PST by aomagrat (IYAOYAS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Basil, the link in post #12 is a great place to start... just skip the first 4 paragraphs where he's preening himself with his accomplishments, then you'll get to the Silveria analysis. Work from that, and you should be able to respond to *spit* CBS articulately.
28 posted on 12/01/2003 10:25:47 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Heather Locklear?
29 posted on 12/01/2003 10:56:37 AM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Thanks for typing in CAPS LOCK, YOU CAPS LOCK FREAK!
44 posted on 12/01/2003 1:09:10 PM PST by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
There's only one way to take this.If they refused to hear it ,it is because the second amendment means what it says.The first ten amendments deal with individual rights and thats where the second amendment falls.
47 posted on 12/01/2003 1:45:51 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Elitist butt-heads...
58 posted on 12/01/2003 9:17:10 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Ted Kennedy is a left-wing Neanderthal turkey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
I guess "International Law" does not cover citizens arming themselves for self defense.

Now, if this had something to do with the old poop shoot, well you KNOW the SCOTUS would be all over it.

59 posted on 12/01/2003 9:22:28 PM PST by technomage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: basil
Blackrobes want the 9th's Left Coast to simmer so the citizens' God-given rights, affirmed by the clear wording of our Bill of Rights, will die down.

SCOTUS has just ruled that our 14th's "equal rights" clause means nothing - to them.

Blackrobes' assault gavels are attacking our RATIFIED Constitution. SCOTUS has been making rulings and speeches stating that they must incorporate more EU law into their decisions. Especially the girls. NOT the "GOOD BEHAVIOR" required of their terms of office.

We citizens must vote into Congress honorable people who will impeach and remove from the courts those who openly attack and undermine our RATIFIED Constitution, the only Law of the Land, Rule of Law, from which they derive any and all of their limited, temporary power. Otherwise, we must rely on our Bill of Rights as written and meant.

Professional agenda driving dastards bet that our Bill of Rights can be nullified through judicial fiat and passing more notoriously unConstitutional laws. To date, they have been correct, always just a few degrees warmer for us frogs. The consent of the governed is being tested by incumbants' tyranny.

IMHO, that is the reason why islamists chose to attack us openly on 9/11/2001. WTC I, TWA 800, and USS Cole did not work because of the Clintons' self-absorbed corruptions.

Americans shall not be disarmed by this government. If Gen. Tommy Franks, Ret., is correct in that our ratified Constitution will be scrapped for martial law when nuke/biowarfare ignites on our soil, then we shall have an exercise in self-government, Mr. Jefferson. This professional, career government is both usurping its limited authorities and refusing to defend our soveriegn borders against the ongoing criminal/islamist invasion.

Self-government is long overdue.

65 posted on 12/01/2003 10:07:34 PM PST by SevenDaysInMay (Federal judges and justices serve for periods of good behavior, not life. Article III sec. 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson